Etymology:N.L. fem. n.Armatimonas, type genus of the type order of the class; L. neut. pl. n. suff.-ia, ending to denote a class; N.L. neut. pl. n.Armatimonadia, the class of the order Armatimonadales
Valid publication:
Tamaki H, Tanaka Y, Matsuzawa H, Muramatsu M, Meng XY, Hanada S, Mori K, Kamagata Y. Armatimonas rosea gen. nov., sp. nov., of a novel bacterial phylum, Armatimonadetes phyl. nov., formally called the candidate phylum OP10. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:1442-1447.
IJSEM list:
Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 61, part 6 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:2027-2028.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
Taxonomic status:
correct name
Emendations:
Cavalier-Smith 2020
Cavalier-Smith T, Chao EE. Multidomain ribosomal protein trees and the planctobacterial origin of neomura (eukaryotes, archaebacteria). Protoplasma 2020; 257:621-753. Notes:
⊕ Emendation accompanied by the inclusion of 2 orders in the class.
⊖ Emendation accompanied by the removal of 1 genus from the class.
🧍 As of 2020-11-15 this emendation was not yet included in an IJSEM List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion.
Notes:
🥇 Nomenclatural type of the phylum "Armatimonadaeota" Oren et al. 2015.Publication:
Oren A, da Costa MS, Garrity GM, Rainey FA, Rossello-Mora R, Schink B, Sutcliffe I, Trujillo ME, Whitman WB. Proposal to include the rank of phylum in the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:4284-4287.
🥇 Nomenclatural type of the phylum "Armatimonadota" Whitman et al. 2018.Publication:
Whitman WB, Oren A, Chuvochina M, da Costa MS, Garrity GM, Rainey FA, Rossello-Mora R, Schink B, Sutcliffe I, Trujillo ME, et al. Proposal of the suffix -ota to denote phyla. Addendum to 'Proposal to include the rank of phylum in the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes'. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:967-969.
🧕 Cavalier-Smith and Chao (2020) assigned this class to the phylum "Armatimonadetes" Tamaki et al. 2011.Publication:
Cavalier-Smith T, Chao EE. Multidomain ribosomal protein trees and the planctobacterial origin of neomura (eukaryotes, archaebacteria). Protoplasma 2020; 257:621-753.
🧕 Cavalier-Smith and Chao (2020) assigned this class to the subkingdom "Eoglycobacteria" Cavalier-Smith 2020.Publication:
Cavalier-Smith T, Chao EE. Multidomain ribosomal protein trees and the planctobacterial origin of neomura (eukaryotes, archaebacteria). Protoplasma 2020; 257:621-753.
🧕 Tamaki et al. (2011) assigned this class to the phylum "Armatimonadetes" Tamaki et al. 2011.Publication:
Tamaki H, Tanaka Y, Matsuzawa H, Muramatsu M, Meng XY, Hanada S, Mori K, Kamagata Y. Armatimonas rosea gen. nov., sp. nov., of a novel bacterial phylum, Armatimonadetes phyl. nov., formally called the candidate phylum OP10. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:1442-1447.
🧒 Cavalier-Smith and Chao (2020) assigned the order Chthonomonadales Lee et al. 2011 to this class.Publication:
Cavalier-Smith T, Chao EE. Multidomain ribosomal protein trees and the planctobacterial origin of neomura (eukaryotes, archaebacteria). Protoplasma 2020; 257:621-753.
🧒 Cavalier-Smith and Chao (2020) assigned the order "Armatimonadetales" to this class.Publication:
Cavalier-Smith T, Chao EE. Multidomain ribosomal protein trees and the planctobacterial origin of neomura (eukaryotes, archaebacteria). Protoplasma 2020; 257:621-753.
🧒 Tamaki et al. (2011) assigned the genus Armatimonas Tamaki et al. 2011 to this class.Publication:
Tamaki H, Tanaka Y, Matsuzawa H, Muramatsu M, Meng XY, Hanada S, Mori K, Kamagata Y. Armatimonas rosea gen. nov., sp. nov., of a novel bacterial phylum, Armatimonadetes phyl. nov., formally called the candidate phylum OP10. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:1442-1447.
🙄 This taxon name is occasionally misprinted (or affected by an OCR error) in some sources as: "Armatimona"; "Armatimonasis".
🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: DSM: 2; NBRC: 2.
🧍 Nomenclatural type changed from Armatimonadales Tamaki et al. 2011 based on new Rule 22.Publication:
Oren A. Emendation of Rules 8, 15, 22, 25a, 30(3)(b), 30(4), 34a, and Appendix 7 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:6070.
🧍 Rule 8 of the 2022 revision of the ICNP does not require that the name of a class validly published before 1 January 2012 be formed from the stem of the name of the type genus of the type order of the class plus the ending ia. However, this name was already formed in that manner.Publication:
Arahal et al. Judicial Opinion No. 128. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:5797.
Subdivision:
Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 2 Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 2 Total number of child taxa: 2