Etymology:De.sul.fo.cap.sa’ce.ae.N.L. fem. n.Desulfocapsa, type genus of the family; L. fem. pl. n. suff.-aceae, ending to denote a family; N.L. fem. pl. n.Desulfocapsaceae, the family of the genus Desulfocapsa
Valid publication:
Waite DW, Chuvochina M, Pelikan C, Parks DH, Yilmaz P, Wagner M, Loy A, Naganuma T, Nakai R, Whitman WB, et al. Proposal to reclassify the proteobacterial classes Deltaproteobacteria and Oligoflexia, and the phylum Thermodesulfobacteria into four phyla reflecting major functional capabilities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5972-6016. 🇳🇿
IJSEM list:
Oren A, Garrity GM. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 70, part 11 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:4645.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
Taxonomic status:
correct name
Notes:
🧕 Waite et al. (2020) assigned this family to the domain "Bacteria" Woese et al. 1990.Publication:
Waite DW, Chuvochina M, Pelikan C, Parks DH, Yilmaz P, Wagner M, Loy A, Naganuma T, Nakai R, Whitman WB, et al. Proposal to reclassify the proteobacterial classes Deltaproteobacteria and Oligoflexia, and the phylum Thermodesulfobacteria into four phyla reflecting major functional capabilities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5972-6016. 🇳🇿
🧒 Song et al. (2021) assigned the genus Desulfosediminicola Song et al. 2023 to this family.Publication:
Song J, Hwang J, Kang I, Cho JC. A sulfate-reducing bacterial genus, Desulfosediminicola gen. nov., comprising two novel species cultivated from tidal-flat sediments. Sci Rep 2021; 11:19978. 🇰🇷
🚃 The type genus of this family has alternatively been placed in the family Desulfobulbaceae Kuever et al. 2006.Publication:
Kuever J, Rainey FA, Widdel F. Family II. Desulfobulbaceae fam. nov. In: Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, Garrity GM (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd edn, vol. 2 (The Proteobacteria), part C (The Alpha-, Beta-, Delta-, and Epsilonproteobacteria), Springer, New York, 2005, p. 988. 🇺🇸
💁 Taxonomists who have recently focused on this group are the corresponding authors of Junghare and Schink (2015). Editors in search of reviewers are advised to consider additional criteria such as whether a taxon is covered by one of the ICSP subcommittees.
🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: DSM: 14; ATCC: 5; JCM: 4; KCTC: 1; NBRC: 1.
Subdivision:
Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 7 Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 7 Total number of child taxa: 8
Assigned by:
Waite DW, Chuvochina M, Pelikan C, Parks DH, Yilmaz P, Wagner M, Loy A, Naganuma T, Nakai R, Whitman WB, et al. Proposal to reclassify the proteobacterial classes Deltaproteobacteria and Oligoflexia, and the phylum Thermodesulfobacteria into four phyla reflecting major functional capabilities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5972-6016. 🇳🇿
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.17367Link copied to clipboard
Record number:
17367
×
Support LPSN
Please sign and share this petition calling for caution before changing bacterial names in databases.