🚋 The type species of this genus has alternatively been placed in the genus "Bacterium" Ehrenberg 1831.Publication:
Braak HR. Onderzoekingen over vergisting van glycerine (Thesis). W.D. Meinema, Delft, 1928.
🚋 The type species of this genus has alternatively been placed in the genus "Bethesda" Kauffmann and Edwards 1952.Publication:
Kauffmann F, Edwards PR. Classification and Nomenclature of Enterobacteriaceae. International Bulletin of Bacteriological Nomenclature and Taxonomy 1952; 2:2-8.
🙄 This taxon name is occasionally misprinted (or affected by an OCR error) in some sources as: "Cifrabacter"; "Cilrobacter"; "Cirrobacter"; "Citerobacter"; "Citobacter"; "Citrobacrer"; "Citrobactcr"; "Citrobacteri"; "Citrobaeter"; "Citrobucter"; "Citrohacter"; "Ciuobacter"; "Cizrobacter"; "Cutrobacter"; "Cztrobacter"; "Gitrobacter"; "Oitrobacter". — 🤨 This taxon name is occasionally used in plural form as: "Citrobacteria".
🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: DSM: 18; CIP: 14; CCUG: 13; ATCC: 13; JCM: 8; LMG: 5; NCTC: 4; KCTC: 3; CECT: 3; NCAIM: 1.
😷 The risk group for Belgium has been imported on 2024-02-05. The full classification is: risk group = 1, note = "sp. biovar 4280: 1 animal pathogen - biological class of risk animal: 2". — The risk group for Canada has been imported on 2024-02-27. The full classification is: risk group = 2, note = "Animal classification RG: 2 - Security sensitive biological agent: No - Terrestrial animal pathogen under Canadian Food Inspection Agency authority: No - Containment level: Containment Level 2". — The risk group for Taiwan has been imported on 2024-11-03. The full classification is: risk group = 2, note = "P650 = v". — If in doubt, use the risk group given in the regulations for your country and, if these are not available, use the risk group given in the catalogue of the culture collection from which you have obtained or intend to obtain the strain.
🧍 Pittman et al. (1991) suggested the abbreviation "CTBT" for this genus name but this does not appear to be of practical relevance any longer.Publication:
Pittman KF, Walczak CA, Lock CM. Codes and abbreviations for approved of effectively published names of genera of bacteria published from January 1980 to December 1990. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1991; 41:571-579.
🧍 See also Jabeen et al. (2023).Publication:
Jabeen I, Islam S, Hassan AKMI, Tasnim Z, Shuvo SR. A brief insight into Citrobacter species - a growing threat to public health. Front Antibiot 2023; 2:1276982. 🇧🇩
🧍 See also O'Hara et al. (1995).Publication:
O'Hara CM, Roman SB, Miller JM. Ability of commercial identification systems to identify newly recognized species of Citrobacter. J Clin Microbiol 1995; 33:242-245. 🇺🇸
🧍 This name was treated in Judicial Opinion 26.Publication:
Judicial Commission. Judicial Opinion No. 26. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1963; 13:35-36.
Subdivision:
Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 19 Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 20 Total number of child taxa: 27
Assigned by:
Adeolu M, Alnajar S, Naushad S, S Gupta R. Genome-based phylogeny and taxonomy of the 'Enterobacteriales': proposal for Enterobacterales ord. nov. divided into the families Enterobacteriaceae, Erwiniaceae fam. nov., Pectobacteriaceae fam. nov., Yersiniaceae fam. nov., Hafniaceae fam. nov., Morganellaceae fam. nov., and Budviciaceae fam. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:5575-5599. 🇨🇦
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.515376Link copied to clipboard