×

Rate our new design

Note: You may need to press Ctrl+F5 or so in your browser to fully load the new page.

Thank you!

Name: Alterinovosphingobium Wang et al. 2025

Category, proposed as: genus, gen. nov.

Etymology: Al.te.ri.no.vo.sphin.go’bi.um. L. masc. pron. alter, another, other, different; N.L. neut. n. Novosphingobium, a genus name; N.L. neut. n. Alterinovosphingobium, another or different Novosphingobium

Gender, pronunciation (Latin): neuter (stem: Alterinovosphingobi-), al-te-ri-no-wo-sphin-GO-bi-um

Type species: Alterinovosphingobium rosa (Takeuchi et al. 1995) Wang et al. 2025

Valid publication: Wang Y, You H, Kong YH, Sun C, Wu LH, Kim SG, Lee JS, Xu L, Xu XW. Genomic-based taxonomic classification of the order Sphingomonadales. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2025; 75:6769. 🇨🇳

IJSEM list: Oren A, Göker M. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 75, part 5 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2025; 75:6824.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: synonym

Correct name: Novosphingobium Takeuchi et al. 2001

  • Notes:
    • 🚂 For the type species of this genus another name is in use, which is affiliated with the genus Novosphingobium Takeuchi et al. 2001. Publication: Takeuchi M, Hamana K, Hiraishi A. Proposal of the genus Sphingomonas sensu stricto and three new genera, Sphingobium, Novosphingobium and Sphingopyxis, on the basis of phylogenetic and chemotaxonomic analyses. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:1405-1417. 🇯🇵
    • 💁 Taxonomists who have recently focused on this group are the corresponding authors of Sheu et al. (2020). Editors in search of reviewers are advised to consider additional criteria such as whether a taxon is covered by one of the ICSP subcommittees.
    • ❗ Alterinovosphingobium is the correct name instead if this genus is regarded as a separate genus (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another genus whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority).
    • 🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: LMG: 5; KCTC: 4; BCRC: 4; KACC: 3; JCM: 3; NBRC: 2; HAMBI: 1; NCIMB: 1; NCPPB: 1; UCM: 1.
    • 🧍 The distinct name Agrinovosphingobium from the same publication has a similar spelling. — 🧍 The distinct name Flavinovosphingobium from the same publication has a similar spelling. — 🧍 The distinct name Paranovosphingobium from the same publication has a similar spelling. Publication: Angell RC, Freund GE, Willett P. Automatic spelling correction using a trigram similarity measure. Information Processing and Management 1983; 19:255-261.

Subdivision:

Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 0
Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 8
Total number of child taxa: 8

Parent taxon: Erythrobacteraceae Lee et al. 2005

Assigned by: Wang Y, You H, Kong YH, Sun C, Wu LH, Kim SG, Lee JS, Xu L, Xu XW. Genomic-based taxonomic classification of the order Sphingomonadales. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2025; 75:6769. 🇨🇳

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.65371Link copied to clipboard

Record number: 65371

  • Previous versions:
    • Version Date JSON
      1 2026-03-31 download