Etymology:Can.di.di’mo.nas.L. adj.candidus -a -um, white; L. fem. n.monas, a unit, monad; N.L. fem. n.Candidimonas, a unit (rod) that produces white colonies
Valid publication:
Vaz-Moreira I, Figueira V, Lopes AR, De Brandt E, Vandamme P, Nunes OC, Manaia CM. Candidimonas nitroreducens gen. nov., sp. nov. and Candidimonas humi sp. nov., isolated from sewage sludge compost. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:2238-2246. 🇵🇹
IJSEM list:
Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 61, part 9 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:2797-2798.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
Taxonomic status:
correct name
Emendations:
Zhang et al. 2012
Zhang DC, Busse HJ, Wieser C, Liu HC, Zhou YG, Schinner F, Margesin R. Candidimonas bauzanensis sp. nov., isolated from soil, and emended description of the genus Candidimonas Vaz-Moreira et al. 2011. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:2084-2089. 🇦🇹
Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 62, part 9 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:2813-2814. Notes:
⊕ Emendation accompanied by the proposal of 1 new species in the genus.
Notes:
😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. The phrase "validly described" is misleading. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details.Publication:
Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281. 🇬🇧
🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: LMG: 3; CCUG: 2; DSM: 2; CGMCC: 1.
Subdivision:
Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 3 Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 3 Total number of child taxa: 3