Name: Fibrisoma Filippini et al. 2011

Category: Genus

Proposed as: gen. nov.

Etymology: Fi.bri.so’ma. L. fem. n. fibra, a fibre, filament; L. vowel -i-, connecting vowel; Gr. neut. n. sôma, body; N.L. neut. n. Fibrisoma, filamentous body (bacterium)

Gender: neuter (stem: Fibrisomat-)

Type species: Fibrisoma limi Filippini et al. 2011

Conduct genome-based taxonomy of genus at TYGS

16S rRNA gene: Analyse FASTA

Valid publication: Filippini M, Kaech A, Ziegler U, Bagheri HC. Fibrisoma limi gen. nov., sp. nov., a filamentous bacterium isolated from tidal flats. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:1418-1424.

IJSEM list: Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 61, part 6 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:2027-2028.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: correct name

• Emendations:
  • Huang et al. 2020 Huang Y, Niu Y, Wang G, Zheng S. Fibrisoma montanum sp. nov., isolated from soil of Mountain Danxia, China. Arch Microbiol 2020; 202:269-273. Oren A, Garrity GM. List of changes in taxonomic opinion no. 32. Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:4061-4090.
    Notes:
    • 😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. The expression "monophyletic clade" is a pleonasm. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details.

• Notes:
  • 🧕 Filippini et al. (2011) assigned this genus to the family Cytophagaceae Stanier 1940 (Approved Lists 1980). Publication: Filippini M, Kaech A, Ziegler U, Bagheri HC. Fibrisoma limi gen. nov., sp. nov., a filamentous bacterium isolated from tidal flats. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:1418-1424.
  • 😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Using the term "phylogenetic data" (or equivalent) for sequence data is not advocated. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details. Publication: Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281.
  • 🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: CCUG: 1; JCM: 1; DSM: 1.

Subdivision:

Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 1
Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 1
Total number of child taxa: 2

• Child taxa:

  • Name	Nomenclatural status	Taxonomic status
    Fibrisoma limi Filippini et al. 2011	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    "Fibrisoma montanum" Huang et al. 2020	not validly published	preferred name (not correct name)

Parent taxon: Spirosomataceae corrig. Larkin and Borrall 1978 (Approved Lists 1980)

Assigned by: Garcia-Lopez M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Tindall BJ, Gronow S, Woyke T, Kyrpides NC, Hahnke RL, Goker M. Analysis of 1,000 Type-Strain Genomes Improves Taxonomic Classification of Bacteroidetes. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:2083.

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/fibrisomaCopy to clipboardLink copied to clipboard

Record number: 518096