Nedashkovskaya OI, Kim SB, Shin DS, Beleneva IA, Mikhailov VV. Fulvivirga kasyanovii gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the phylum Bacteroidetes isolated from seawater in a mussel farm. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:1046-1049.
Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 57, part 5 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:1675-1676.
Goldberg et al. 2020
Goldberg SR, Correa H, Haltli BA, Kerr RG. Fulvivirga aurantia sp. nov. and Xanthovirga aplysinae gen. nov., sp. nov., marine bacteria isolated from the sponge Aplysina fistularis, and emended description of the genus Fulvivirga. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:2766-2781.
Oren A, Garrity GM. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 70, part 4 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:4050-4060. Notes:
Emendation accompanied by the proposal of 1 new species in the genus.
The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. The expression "monophyletic clade" is a pleonasm. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the ((text/phylogenetic-inference#the-role-of-phylogenies-in-taxonomic-classification==LPSN phylogeny page)) for details.
Nomenclatural type of the family Fulvivirgaceae García-López et al. 2020.Publication:
Garcia-Lopez M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Tindall BJ, Gronow S, Woyke T, Kyrpides NC, Hahnke RL, Goker M. Analysis of 1,000 Type-Strain Genomes Improves Taxonomic Classification of Bacteroidetes. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:2083.
Nupur et al. (2012) assigned this genus to the family Flammeovirgaceae Yoon et al. 2011.Publication:
Nupur, Sharma S, Kumar Singh P, Suresh K, Anil Kumar P. Fulvivirga imtechensis sp. nov., a member of the phylum Bacteroidetes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:2213-2217.
The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Using the term "phylogenetic data" (or equivalent) for sequence data is not advocated. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details.Publication:
Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281.
Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 4 Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 4 Total number of child taxa: 4