Genus Luteovulum

Name: Luteovulum Suresh et al. 2020

Category: Genus

Proposed as: gen. nov.

Etymology: Lu.te.o’vu.lum. L. masc. adj. luteus, yellow; N.L. neut. dim. n. ovulum, a small egg; from L. neut. n. ovum, an egg; N.L. neut. dim. n. Luteovulum, small yellow egg

Gender: neuter (stem: Luteovul-)

Type species: Luteovulum sphaeroides (van Niel 1944) Suresh et al. 2020

Effective publication: Suresh G, Lodha TD, Indu B, Sasikala C, Ramana CV. Corrigendum: Taxogenomics Resolves Conflict in the Genus Rhodobacter: A Two and Half Decades Pending Thought to Reclassify the Genus Rhodobacter. Front Microbiol 2020; 11:1111.

IJSEM list: Oren A, Garrity GM. Validation list no. 196. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5596-5601.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: synonym

Correct name: Cereibacter Suresh et al. 2015

Synonyms:

Name	Kind
Cereibacter Suresh et al. 2015	heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP

Notes:
- For the type species of this genus another name is in use, which is affiliated with the genus Cereibacter Suresh et al. 2015. Publication: Hordt A, Lopez MG, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Schleuning M, Weinhold LM, Tindall BJ, Gronow S, Kyrpides NC, Woyke T, Goker M. Analysis of 1,000+ Type-Strain Genomes Substantially Improves Taxonomic Classification of Alphaproteobacteria. Front Microbiol 2020; 11:468.
- Taxonomists who have recently focused on this group are the corresponding authors of Girija et al. (2010), Suresh et al. (2020). Editors in search of reviewers are advised to consider additional criteria such as whether a taxon is covered by one of the ICSP subcommittees.
- Luteovulum is the correct name if this genus is regarded as a separate genus (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another genus whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority).
- The phylogenomic assignment score of this taxon is 0.13820 (N = 1).
- The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: JCM: 7; CCUG: 3; NBRC: 3; DSM: 3; LMG: 3; IFO: 3; KCTC: 2; CECT: 1; ATCC: 1.
- See also Suresh et al. (2019). – Instead of proposing a new genus, the Rhodobacter species that formed the sister group of Cereibacter in the phylogenomic analysis could as well be included in Cereibacter, which is a more conservative solution. Publication: Suresh G, Lodha TD, Indu B, Sasikala C, Ramana CV. Taxogenomics Resolves Conflict in the Genus Rhodobacter: A Two and Half Decades Pending Thought to Reclassify the Genus Rhodobacter. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:2480.

Subdivision:

Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 0
Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 5
Total number of child taxa: 9

Child taxa:

Name	Nomenclatural status	Taxonomic status
Luteovulum alkalitolerans (Gandham et al. 2019) Suresh et al. 2020	validly published under the ICNP	synonym
"Luteovulum alkalitolerans" (Gandham et al. 2019) Suresh et al. 2019	not validly published
"Luteovulum azotoformans" (Hiraishi et al. 1997) Suresh et al. 2019	not validly published
Luteovulum azotoformans (Hiraishi et al. 1997) Suresh et al. 2020	validly published under the ICNP	synonym
"Luteovulum johrii" (Girija et al. 2010) Suresh et al. 2019	not validly published
Luteovulum johrii (Girija et al. 2010) Suresh et al. 2020	validly published under the ICNP	synonym
"Luteovulum ovatum" (Srinivas et al. 2008) Suresh et al. 2019	not validly published
Luteovulum ovatum (Srinivas et al. 2008) Suresh et al. 2020	validly published under the ICNP	synonym
Luteovulum sphaeroides (van Niel 1944) Suresh et al. 2020	validly published under the ICNP	synonym

Parent taxon: Rhodobacteraceae Garrity et al. 2006

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/luteovulumLink copied to clipboard

Record number: 9036

This LPSN page was printed on 2022-08-10 14:07:36