Name: Lutibaculum Anil Kumar et al. 2012

Category: Genus

Proposed as: gen. nov.

Etymology: Lu.ti.ba’cu.lum. L. neut. n. lutum, mud; L. neut. n. baculum, rod; N.L. neut. n. Lutibaculum, rod from mud

Gender, pronunciation: neuter (stem: Lutibacul-), lu-ti-BA-ku-lum

Type species: Lutibaculum baratangense Anil Kumar et al. 2012

Conduct genome-based taxonomy of genus at TYGS

16S rRNA gene: Analyse FASTA

Valid publication: Kumar PA, Srinivas TN, Manasa P, Madhu S, Shivaji S. Lutibaculum baratangense gen. nov., sp. nov., a proteobacterium isolated from a mud volcano. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:2025-2031.

IJSEM list: Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 62, part 8 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:2555-2556.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: correct name

• Emendations:
  • Lee 2019 Lee SD. Lutibaculum pontilimi sp. nov., isolated from a tidal mudflat and emended description of the genus Lutibaculum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:422-426. Oren A, Garrity GM. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 69, part 2 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:1251-1252.
    Notes:
    • ⊕ Emendation accompanied by the proposal of 1 new species in the genus.

• Notes:
  • 🧕 Anil-Kumar et al. (2012) assigned this genus to the family Rhodobiaceae Garrity et al. 2006. Publication: Kumar PA, Srinivas TN, Manasa P, Madhu S, Shivaji S. Lutibaculum baratangense gen. nov., sp. nov., a proteobacterium isolated from a mud volcano. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:2025-2031.
  • 😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Using the term "phylogenetic data" (or equivalent) for sequence data is not advocated. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details. Publication: Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281.
  • 🧬 The phylogenomic assignment score of this taxon is 0.05942 (N = 21).
  • 🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: NBRC: 2; KCTC: 2; DSM: 1; CCUG: 1.

Subdivision:

Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 2
Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 2
Total number of child taxa: 2

• Child taxa:

  • Name	Nomenclatural status	Taxonomic status
    Lutibaculum baratangense Anil Kumar et al. 2012	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Lutibaculum pontilimi Lee 2019	validly published under the ICNP	correct name

Parent taxon: Tepidamorphaceae Hördt et al. 2020

Assigned by: Hordt A, Lopez MG, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Schleuning M, Weinhold LM, Tindall BJ, Gronow S, Kyrpides NC, Woyke T, Goker M. Analysis of 1,000+ Type-Strain Genomes Substantially Improves Taxonomic Classification of Alphaproteobacteria. Front Microbiol 2020; 11:468.

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/lutibaculumCopy to clipboardLink copied to clipboard

Record number: 518232