Name:Malaciobacter corrig. Pérez-Cataluña et al. 2019
Category, proposed as: genus, gen. nov.
Etymology:Ma.la.ci.o.bac’ter. Gr. n. malaco, soft, with soft boy, mollusc; N.L. masc. n.bacter, rod; N.L. masc. n.Malaciobacter, bacteria isolated from molluscs
Effective publication:
Perez-Cataluna A, Salas-Masso N, Dieguez AL, Balboa S, Lema A, Romalde JL, Figueras MJ. Revisiting the Taxonomy of the Genus Arcobacter: Getting Order From the Chaos. Front Microbiol 2018; 9:2077. 🇪🇸
IJSEM list:
Oren A, Garrity GM. Validation list no. 185. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:5-9.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP
Notes:
🚂 For the type species of this genus another name is in use, which is affiliated with the genus Arcobacter Vandamme et al. 1991.Publication:
Donachie SP, Bowman JP, On SL, Alam M. Arcobacter halophilus sp. nov., the first obligate halophile in the genus Arcobacter. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1271-1277. 🇺🇸
🚋 The type species of this genus has alternatively been placed in the genus Malacobacter Pérez-Cataluña et al. 2019.Publication:
Perez-Cataluna A, Salas-Masso N, Dieguez AL, Balboa S, Lema A, Romalde JL, Figueras MJ. Revisiting the Taxonomy of the Genus Arcobacter: Getting Order From the Chaos. Front Microbiol 2018; 9:2077. 🇪🇸
💁 Taxonomists who have recently focused on this group are the corresponding authors of Perez-Cataluna et al. (2018). Editors in search of reviewers are advised to consider additional criteria such as whether a taxon is covered by one of the ICSP subcommittees.
❗ Malaciobacter is the correct name instead if this genus is regarded as a separate genus (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another genus whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority).
🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: DSM: 5; LMG: 4; CECT: 3; JCM: 2; CGMCC: 1; KCCM: 1; ATCC: 1; CIP: 1.
🧍 The dissection of Arcobacter was opposed by On et al. (2020).Publication:
On SLW, Miller WG, Biggs PJ, Cornelius AJ, Vandamme P. A critical rebuttal of the proposed division of the genus Arcobacter into six genera using comparative genomic, phylogenetic, and phenotypic criteria. Syst Appl Microbiol 2020; 43:126108. 🇳🇿
Subdivision:
Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 0 Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 6 Total number of child taxa: 6
Assigned by:
Perez-Cataluna A, Salas-Masso N, Dieguez AL, Balboa S, Lema A, Romalde JL, Figueras MJ. Revisiting the Taxonomy of the Genus Arcobacter: Getting Order From the Chaos. Front Microbiol 2018; 9:2077. 🇪🇸
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.520458Link copied to clipboard
Record number:
520458
×
Support LPSN
Please sign and share this petition calling for caution before changing bacterial names in databases.