Name: Parachryseolinea Wang et al. 2022

Category: Genus

Proposed as: gen. nov.

Etymology: Pa.ra.chry.se.o.li’ne.a. Gr. prep. para, like, beside; N.L. fem. n. Chryseolinea, the name of a bacterial genus; N.L. fem. n. Parachryseolinea, resembling the genus Chryseolinea, referring to the close relationship to the genus Chryseolinea

Gender: feminine (stem: Parachryseoline-)

Type species: Parachryseolinea silvisoli Wang et al. 2022

Conduct genome-based taxonomy of genus at TYGS

16S rRNA gene: Analyse FASTA

Valid publication: Wang C, Lv Y, Li A, Yao Q, Zhu H. Parachryseolinea silvisoli gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from forest soil, and reclassification of Chryseolinea flava as Pseudochryseolinea flava gen. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:5523.

IJSEM list: Oren A, Göker M. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 72, part 10 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:5736.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: correct name

• Notes:
  • 😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Using the term "phylogenetic data" (or equivalent) for sequence data is not advocated. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details. Publication: Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281.
  • 🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: JCM: 1.
  • 🧍 The distinct name Pseudochryseolinea from the same publication has a similar spelling. Publication: Angell RC, Freund GE, Willett P. Automatic spelling correction using a trigram similarity measure. Information Processing and Management 1983; 19:255-261.

Subdivision:

Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 1
Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 1
Total number of child taxa: 1

• Child taxa:

  • Name	Nomenclatural status	Taxonomic status
    Parachryseolinea silvisoli Wang et al. 2022	validly published under the ICNP	correct name

Parent taxon: Fulvivirgaceae García-López et al. 2020

Assigned by: Wang C, Lv Y, Li A, Yao Q, Zhu H. Parachryseolinea silvisoli gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from forest soil, and reclassification of Chryseolinea flava as Pseudochryseolinea flava gen. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:5523.

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/parachryseolineaCopy to clipboardLink copied to clipboard

Record number: 30237