Etymology:Pa.ra.ro.se.o’mo.nas.Gr. prep.para, next to, resembling; N.L. fem. n.Roseomonas, a bacterial genus; N.L. fem. n.Pararoseomonas, next to Roseomonas
Effective publication:
Rai A, Jagadeeshwari U, Deepshikha G, Smita N, Sasikala C, Ramana CV. Phylotaxogenomics for the Reappraisal of the Genus Roseomonas With the Creation of Six New Genera. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:677842. 🇮🇳
IJSEM list:
Oren A, Garrity GM. Validation list no. 203. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:5167.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP, illegitimate name
homotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP
Notes:
🚂 For the type species of this genus another name is in use, which is affiliated with the genus Muricoccus Kämpfer et al. 2003.Publication:
Kampfer P, Andersson MA, Jackel U, Salkinoja-Salonen M. Teichococcus ludipueritiae gen. nov. sp. nov., and Muricoccus roseus gen. nov. sp. nov. representing two new genera of the alpha-1 subclass of the Proteobacteria. Syst Appl Microbiol 2003; 26:23-29. 🇩🇪
🙄 This taxon name is occasionally misprinted (or affected by an OCR error) in some sources as: "Paraoseomonas".
😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details.Publication:
Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281. 🇬🇧
🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: DSM: 5; KCTC: 3; KACC: 3; CPCC: 2; CIP: 2; NBRC: 2; JCM: 2; KEMB: 1; LMG: 1; CCM: 1.
🧍 Illegitimate according to Rule 51b(1) as it includes the nomenclatural type of Muricoccus Kämpfer et al. 2003.Publication:
Kampfer P, Andersson MA, Jackel U, Salkinoja-Salonen M. Teichococcus ludipueritiae gen. nov. sp. nov., and Muricoccus roseus gen. nov. sp. nov. representing two new genera of the alpha-1 subclass of the Proteobacteria. Syst Appl Microbiol 2003; 26:23-29. 🇩🇪
🧍 The distinct name Paeniroseomonas from the same publication has a similar spelling.Publication:
Angell RC, Freund GE, Willett P. Automatic spelling correction using a trigram similarity measure. Information Processing and Management 1983; 19:255-261.
Subdivision:
Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 0 Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 8 Total number of child taxa: 8
Assigned by:
Rai A, Jagadeeshwari U, Deepshikha G, Smita N, Sasikala C, Ramana CV. Phylotaxogenomics for the Reappraisal of the Genus Roseomonas With the Creation of Six New Genera. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:677842. 🇮🇳
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.26494Link copied to clipboard