Genus Plastoroseomonas
Name: Plastoroseomonas Rai et al. 2022
Etymology: Plas.to.ros.e.o.mo’nas. Gr. masc. adj. plastos, false; N.L. fem. n. Roseomonas, a bacterial genus; N.L. fem. n. Plastoroseomonas, a false Roseomonas
Gender: feminine (stem: Plastoroseomonad-)
Type species: Plastoroseomonas arctica (Qiu et al. 2016) Rai et al. 2022
Effective publication:
Rai A, Jagadeeshwari U, Deepshikha G, Smita N, Sasikala C, Ramana CV. Phylotaxogenomics for the Reappraisal of the Genus Roseomonas With the Creation of Six New Genera. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:677842. 
IJSEM list:
Oren A, Garrity GM. Validation list no. 203. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:5167.
Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP
Correct name: Roseomonas Rihs et al. 1998
-
Synonyms:
-
Name Kind Roseomonas Rihs et al. 1998 heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP Falsiroseomonas Rai et al. 2022 heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP Pseudoroseomonas Rai et al. 2022 heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP Neoroseomonas Rai et al. 2022 heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP Teichococcus Kämpfer et al. 2003 heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP Paeniroseomonas Rai et al. 2022 heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP
-
-
Notes:
-
For the type species of this genus another name is in use, which is affiliated with the genus Roseomonas Rihs et al. 1998.
Publication:
Qiu X, Qu Z, Jiang F, Lin Y, Zhang Y, Chang X, Da X, Deng S, Kim M, Fang C, et al. Roseomonas arctica sp. nov., isolated from arctic glacial foreland soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1218-1223.
- The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details. Publication: Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281.
- Plastoroseomonas is the correct name if this genus is regarded as a separate genus (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another genus whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority).
- The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: LMG: 2; CECT: 1.
-
For the type species of this genus another name is in use, which is affiliated with the genus Roseomonas Rihs et al. 1998.
Publication:
Qiu X, Qu Z, Jiang F, Lin Y, Zhang Y, Chang X, Da X, Deng S, Kim M, Fang C, et al. Roseomonas arctica sp. nov., isolated from arctic glacial foreland soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1218-1223.
Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 0
Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 2
Total number of child taxa: 2
-
Child taxa:
-
Name Nomenclatural status Taxonomic status Plastoroseomonas arctica (Qiu et al. 2016) Rai et al. 2022 validly published under the ICNP synonym Plastoroseomonas hellenica (Rat et al. 2021) Rai et al. 2022 validly published under the ICNP synonym
-
Parent taxon: Acetobacteraceae (ex Henrici 1939) Gillis and De Ley 1980
Assigned by:
Rai A, Jagadeeshwari U, Deepshikha G, Smita N, Sasikala C, Ramana CV. Phylotaxogenomics for the Reappraisal of the Genus Roseomonas With the Creation of Six New Genera. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:677842.
Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/plastoroseomonasLink copied to clipboard
Record number: 26504
This LPSN page was printed on 2023-09-27 07:34:23