Effective publication:
Rai A, Jagadeeshwari U, Deepshikha G, Smita N, Sasikala C, Ramana CV. Phylotaxogenomics for the Reappraisal of the Genus Roseomonas With the Creation of Six New Genera. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:677842. 🇮🇳
IJSEM list:
Oren A, Garrity GM. Validation list no. 203. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:5167.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
Taxonomic status:
correct name
Notes:
🚋 The type species of this genus has alternatively been placed in the genus Roseomonas Rihs et al. 1998.Publication:
Qiu X, Qu Z, Jiang F, Lin Y, Zhang Y, Chang X, Da X, Deng S, Kim M, Fang C, et al.Roseomonas arctica sp. nov., isolated from arctic glacial foreland soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1218-1223. 🇨🇳
😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details.Publication:
Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281. 🇬🇧
🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: LMG: 2; CECT: 1; CCTCC: 1.
Subdivision:
Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 2 Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 2 Total number of child taxa: 2
Assigned by:
Rai A, Jagadeeshwari U, Deepshikha G, Smita N, Sasikala C, Ramana CV. Phylotaxogenomics for the Reappraisal of the Genus Roseomonas With the Creation of Six New Genera. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:677842. 🇮🇳
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.26504Link copied to clipboard