Valid publication:
Zhang QM, Fu JC, Chen ZQ, Qiu LH. Paracidobacterium acidisoli gen. nov., sp. nov. and Alloacidobacterium dinghuense gen. nov., sp. nov., two acidobacteria isolated from forest soil, and reclassification of Acidobacterium ailaaui and Acidipila dinghuensis as Pseudacidobacterium ailaaui gen. nov., comb. nov. and Silvibacterium dinghuense comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:5415. 🇨🇳
IJSEM list:
Oren A, Garrity GM. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 72, part 6 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:5524.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP
Notes:
🚂 For the type species of this genus another name is in use, which is affiliated with the genus Acidobacterium Kishimoto et al. 1991.Publication:
Myers MR, King GM. Isolation and characterization of Acidobacterium ailaaui sp. nov., a novel member of Acidobacteria subdivision 1, from a geothermally heated Hawaiian microbial mat. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:5328-5335. 🇺🇸
🙄 This taxon name is occasionally misprinted (or affected by an OCR error) in some sources as: "Pseudoacidobacterium".
😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Using the term "phylogenetic data" (or equivalent) for sequence data is not advocated. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details.Publication:
Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281. 🇬🇧
❗ Pseudacidobacterium is the correct name instead if this genus is regarded as a separate genus (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another genus whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority).
🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: KACC: 1; DSM: 1; LMG: 1; NBRC: 1.
🧍 The distinct name Alloacidobacterium from the same publication has a similar spelling. — 🧍 The distinct name Paracidobacterium from the same publication has a similar spelling.Publication:
Angell RC, Freund GE, Willett P. Automatic spelling correction using a trigram similarity measure. Information Processing and Management 1983; 19:255-261.
Subdivision:
Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 0 Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 1 Total number of child taxa: 2
Assigned by:
Zhang QM, Fu JC, Chen ZQ, Qiu LH. Paracidobacterium acidisoli gen. nov., sp. nov. and Alloacidobacterium dinghuense gen. nov., sp. nov., two acidobacteria isolated from forest soil, and reclassification of Acidobacterium ailaaui and Acidipila dinghuensis as Pseudacidobacterium ailaaui gen. nov., comb. nov. and Silvibacterium dinghuense comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:5415. 🇨🇳
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.28426Link copied to clipboard
Record number:
28426
×
Support LPSN
Please sign and share this petition calling for caution before changing bacterial names in databases.