Name: Pseudoroseomonas Rai et al. 2022

Category: Genus

Proposed as: gen. nov.

Etymology: Pseu.do.ro.se.o.mo’nas. Gr. masc./fem. adj. pseudês, false; N.L. fem. n. Roseomonas, a bacterial genus; N.L. fem. n. Pseudoroseomonas, false Roseomonas

Gender: feminine (stem: Pseudoroseomonad-)

Type species: Pseudoroseomonas cervicalis (Rihs et al. 1998) Rai et al. 2022

Effective publication: Rai A, Jagadeeshwari U, Deepshikha G, Smita N, Sasikala C, Ramana CV. Phylotaxogenomics for the Reappraisal of the Genus Roseomonas With the Creation of Six New Genera. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:677842.

IJSEM list: Oren A, Garrity GM. Validation list no. 203. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:5167.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: synonym

Correct name: Roseomonas Rihs et al. 1998

• Synonyms:

  • Name	Kind
    Roseomonas Rihs et al. 1998	heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP
    Plastoroseomonas Rai et al. 2022	heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP
    Falsiroseomonas Rai et al. 2022	heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP
    Neoroseomonas Rai et al. 2022	heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP
    Teichococcus Kämpfer et al. 2003	heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP
    Paeniroseomonas Rai et al. 2022	heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP

• Notes:
  • For the type species of this genus another name is in use, which is affiliated with the genus Roseomonas Rihs et al. 1998. Publication: Rihs JD, Brenner DJ, Weaver RE, Steigerwalt AG, Hollis DG, Yu VL. Roseomonas, a new genus associated with bacteremia and other human infections. J Clin Microbiol 1993; 31:3275-3283.
  • Taxonomists who have recently focused on this group are the corresponding authors of Subhash and Lee (2018), Rai et al. (2021). Editors in search of reviewers are advised to consider additional criteria such as whether a taxon is covered by one of the ICSP subcommittees.
  • The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details. Publication: Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281.
  • Pseudoroseomonas is the correct name if this genus is regarded as a separate genus (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another genus whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority).
  • The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: KCTC: 5; JCM: 4; NBRC: 3; CIP: 2; DSM: 2; MCCC: 1; TBRC: 1; ATCC: 1; BCC: 1; CGMCC: 1.

Subdivision:

Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 0
Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 16
Total number of child taxa: 16

• Child taxa:

  • Name	Nomenclatural status	Taxonomic status
    Pseudoroseomonas aerofrigidensis (Hyeon and Jeon 2017) Rai et al. 2022	validly published under the ICNP	synonym
    Pseudoroseomonas aerophila (Kim et al. 2013) Rai et al. 2022	validly published under the ICNP	synonym
    Pseudoroseomonas aestuarii (Venkata Ramana et al. 2010) Rai et al. 2022	validly published under the ICNP	synonym
    Pseudoroseomonas cervicalis (Rihs et al. 1998) Rai et al. 2022	validly published under the ICNP	synonym
    Pseudoroseomonas coralli (Li et al. 2021) Rai et al. 2022	validly published under the ICNP	synonym
    Pseudoroseomonas deserti (Subhash and Lee 2018) Rai et al. 2022	validly published under the ICNP	synonym
    Pseudoroseomonas globiformis (Fang et al. 2018) Rai et al. 2022	validly published under the ICNP	synonym
    Pseudoroseomonas hibiscisoli (Yan et al. 2017) Rai et al. 2022	validly published under the ICNP	synonym
    Pseudoroseomonas ludipueritiae (Kämpfer et al. 2003) Rai et al. 2022	validly published under the ICNP, illegitimate name	synonym
    Pseudoroseomonas musae (Nutaratat et al. 2017) Rai et al. 2022	validly published under the ICNP	synonym
    Pseudoroseomonas oryzae (Ramaprasad et al. 2015) Rai et al. 2022	validly published under the ICNP	synonym
    Pseudoroseomonas rhizosphaerae (Chen et al. 2014) Rai et al. 2022	validly published under the ICNP	synonym
    Pseudoroseomonas rubra (Subhash et al. 2016) Rai et al. 2022	validly published under the ICNP	synonym
    Pseudoroseomonas suffusca (Subhash and Lee 2017) Rai et al. 2022	validly published under the ICNP	synonym
    Pseudoroseomonas vastitatis (Zhao et al. 2020) Rai et al. 2022	validly published under the ICNP	synonym
    Pseudoroseomonas wenyumeiae (Tian et al. 2019) Rai et al. 2022	validly published under the ICNP	synonym

Parent taxon: Acetobacteraceae (ex Henrici 1939) Gillis and De Ley 1980

Assigned by: Rai A, Jagadeeshwari U, Deepshikha G, Smita N, Sasikala C, Ramana CV. Phylotaxogenomics for the Reappraisal of the Genus Roseomonas With the Creation of Six New Genera. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:677842.

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/pseudoroseomonasCopy to clipboardLink copied to clipboard

Record number: 26505