Etymology:
Ru.mi.no.coc.cus. L. neut. n.rumen (gen. ruminis), the rumen; N.L. masc. n.coccus, coccus; from Gr. masc. n.kokkos, grain, seed; N.L. masc. n.Ruminococcus, coccus of the rumen
Effective publication:
Sijpesteijn AK. Cellulose-decomposing bacteria from the rumen of cattle. Thesis. University of Leiden, Leiden in The Netherlands, 1948.
IJSEM list:
Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Approved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225-420.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
Taxonomic status:
correct name
Risk group:
2
Emendations:
Moore et al. 1972
Moore WEC, Cato EP, Holdeman LV. Ruminococcus bromii sp. n. and emendation of the description of Ruminococcus Sijpestein. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 1972; 22:78-80. Notes:
⊕ Emendation accompanied by the proposal of 1 new species in the genus.
🧍 As of 2023-10-12 this emendation was not yet included in an IJSEM List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion.
Notes:
🥇 Nomenclatural type of the family Ruminococcaceae Rainey 2010.Publication:
Rainey FA. Family VIII. Ruminococcaceae fam. nov. In: De Vos P, Garrity GM, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, K.-H. S, Whitman WB (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd edn, vol. 3 (The Firmicutes), Springer, New York, 2009, p. 1016.
🧕 Boone et al. (2001) assigned this genus to the family "Lachnospiraceae".Publication:
Garrity GM, Holt JG. The Road Map to the Manual. In: Boone DR, Castenholz RW, Garrity GM (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, second edition, vol. 1 (The Archaea and the deeply branching and phototrophic Bacteria), Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001, p. 119-166.
🧕 Cavalier-Smith (1981) assigned this genus to the subkingdom "Eubacteria" Cavalier-Smith 1981.Publication:
Cavalier-Smith T. Eukaryote kingdoms: seven or nine? Biosystems 1981; 14:461-481.
🧕 De Vos et al. (2009) assigned this genus to the family Ruminococcaceae Rainey 2010.Publication:
Rainey FA. Family VIII. Ruminococcaceae fam. nov. In: De Vos P, Garrity GM, Jones D, Krieg NR, Ludwig W, Rainey FA, K.-H. S, Whitman WB (eds), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd edn, vol. 3 (The Firmicutes), Springer, New York, 2009, p. 1016.
🙄 This taxon name is occasionally misprinted (or affected by an OCR error) in some sources as: "Itmninococcus"; "Minococcus"; "Ruininococcus"; "Rumanococcus"; "Ruminecoccus"; "Ruminicoccus"; "Ruminoccoccus"; "Ruminoccocus"; "Ruminoccous"; "Ruminoccus"; "Ruminoceccus"; "Ruminococccus"; "Ruminococeus"; "Ruminococus"; "Ruminocoecus"; "Ruminocorcus"; "Ruminoeoccus"; "Rumiococcus"; "Rumirtococcus"; "Rumlnococcus"; "Rumminococcus"; "Rurminococcus"; "Rurninococcus"; "Rusminococcus".
🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: DSM: 13; ATCC: 12; JCM: 11; CCUG: 6; CIP: 5; KCTC: 2; NCTC: 1; CGMCC: 1.
😷 The risk group for Canada has been imported on 2024-02-27. The full classification is: risk group = 2, note = "ID8: 2 Animal classification RG: 2 - Security sensitive biological agent: No - Terrestrial animal pathogen under Canadian Food Inspection Agency authority: No - Containment level: Containment Level 2; default: 1 Animal classification RG: 1 - Security sensitive biological agent: No - Terrestrial animal pathogen under Canadian Food Inspection Agency authority: No - Containment level: Containment Level 1". — The risk group for Taiwan has been imported on 2024-11-03. The full classification is: risk group = 1, note = "P650 = v". — If in doubt, use the risk group given in the regulations for your country and, if these are not available, use the risk group given in the catalogue of the culture collection from which you have obtained or intend to obtain the strain.
🧍 A genome-scale phylogenetic analysis of the genus Ruminococcus was conducted by La Reau et al. (2016).Publication:
La Reau AJ, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Suen G. Sequence-based analysis of the genus Ruminococcus resolves its phylogeny and reveals strong host association. Microb Genom 2016; 2:e000099.
🧍 Pittman et al. (1991) suggested the abbreviation "RMCO" for this genus name but this does not appear to be of practical relevance any longer.Publication:
Pittman KF, Walczak CA, Lock CM. Codes and abbreviations for approved of effectively published names of genera of bacteria published from January 1980 to December 1990. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1991; 41:571-579.
Subdivision:
Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 10 Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 20 Total number of child taxa: 29
Assigned by:
Tindall BJ. The names Hungateiclostridium Zhang et al. 2018, Hungateiclostridium thermocellum (Viljoen et al. 1926) Zhang et al. 2018, Hungateiclostridium cellulolyticum (Patel et al. 1980) Zhang et al. 2018, Hungateiclostridium aldrichii (Yang et al. 1990) Zhang et al. 2018, Hungateiclostridium alkalicellulosi (Zhilina et al. 2006) Zhang et al. 2018, Hungateiclostridium clariflavum (Shiratori et al. 2009) Zhang et al. 2018, Hungateiclostridium straminisolvens (Kato et al. 2004) Zhang et al. 2018 and Hungateiclostridium saccincola (Koeck et al. 2016) Zhang et al. 2018 contravene Rule 51b of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes and require replacement names in the genus Acetivibrio Patel et al. 1980. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:3927-3932.
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/ruminococcusLink copied to clipboard