×

Rate our new design

Note: You may need to press Ctrl+F5 or so in your browser to fully load the new page.

Thank you!

Name: Simplicispira Grabovich et al. 2006

Category, proposed as: genus, gen. nov.

Etymology: Sim.pli.ci.spi’ra. L. adj. simplex, simple; Gr. fem. n. speîra, a spiral; N.L. fem. n. Simplicispira, a simple spiral

Gender, pronunciation (Latin): feminine (stem: Simplicispir-), sim-pli-ki-SPI-ra

Type species: Simplicispira metamorpha (Terasaki 1961) Grabovich et al. 2006

16S rRNA gene: Analysetree FASTA download

Valid publication: Grabovich M, Gavrish E, Kuever J, Lysenko AM, Podkopaeva D, Dubinina G. Proposal of Giesbergeria voronezhensis gen. nov., sp. nov. and G. kuznetsovii sp. nov. and reclassification of [Aquaspirillum] anulus, [A.] sinuosum and [A.] giesbergeri as Giesbergeria anulus comb. nov., G. sinuosa comb. nov. and G. giesbergeri comb. nov., and [Aquaspirillum] metamorphum and [A.] psychrophilum as Simplicispira metamorpha gen. nov., comb. nov. and S. psychrophila comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:569-576. 🇷🇺

IJSEM list: Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 56, part 3 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:1181-1182.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: correct name

  • Notes:
    • 🚋 The type species of this genus has alternatively been placed in the genus Aquaspirillum Hylemon et al. 1973 (Approved Lists 1980). Publication: Hylemon PB, Wells Jr. JS, Krieg NR, Jannasch HW. The genus Spirillum: A taxonomic study. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 1973; 23:340-380.
    • 🚋 The type species of this genus has alternatively been placed in the genus "Spirillum" Hassall 1845. Publication: Terasaki Y. On two new species of Spirillum. Botanical Magazine (Tokyo) 1961; 74:220-227.
    • 🙄 This taxon name is occasionally misprinted (or affected by an OCR error) in some sources as: "Simplocospira".
    • 😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Using the term "phylogenetic data" (or equivalent) for sequence data is not advocated. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details. Publication: Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281. 🇬🇧
    • 🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: NBRC: 5; DSM: 4; KACC: 4; IFO: 2; ATCC: 2; KCTC: 2; LMG: 2; CPCC: 1; KEMB: 1; CGMCC: 1.

Subdivision:

Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 9
Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 9
Total number of child taxa: 9

Parent taxon: Comamonadaceae Willems et al. 1991

Assigned by: Grabovich M, Gavrish E, Kuever J, Lysenko AM, Podkopaeva D, Dubinina G. Proposal of Giesbergeria voronezhensis gen. nov., sp. nov. and G. kuznetsovii sp. nov. and reclassification of [Aquaspirillum] anulus, [A.] sinuosum and [A.] giesbergeri as Giesbergeria anulus comb. nov., G. sinuosa comb. nov. and G. giesbergeri comb. nov., and [Aquaspirillum] metamorphum and [A.] psychrophilum as Simplicispira metamorpha gen. nov., comb. nov. and S. psychrophila comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:569-576. 🇷🇺

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.516601Link copied to clipboard

Record number: 516601