homotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP
The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Using the term "phylogenetic data" (or equivalent) for sequence data is not advocated. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details.Publication:
Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281.
Aeromonassharmana is the correct name instead if this species is regarded as a separate species (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another species whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority) within a separate genus Aeromonas.
According to Saavedra et al. 2006, and to Martínez-Murcia et al. 2007, Aeromonas sharmana does not belong to the genus Aeromonas.Publication:
Saavedra MJ, Figueras MJ, Martinez-Murcia AJ. Updated phylogeny of the genus Aeromonas. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:2481-2487.
Martinez-Murcia AJ, Figueras MJ, Saavedra MJ, Stackebrandt E. The recently proposed species Aeromonas sharmana sp. nov., isolate GPTSA-6T, is not a member of the genus Aeromonas. Int Microbiol 2007; 10:61-64.