Etymology:
a.xar.qui.en’sis. L. masc. adj.axarquiensis, pertaining to Axarquia, the Arabic name for the region surrounding the city of Málaga in southern Spain
Valid publication:
Ruiz-Garcia C, Quesada E, Martinez-Checa F, Llamas I, Urdaci MC, Bejar V. Bacillus axarquiensis sp. nov. and Bacillus malacitensis sp. nov., isolated from river-mouth sediments in southern Spain. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1279-1285.
IJSEM list:
Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 55, part 3 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1747-1749.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP
Emendations:
Dunlap et al. 2016
Dunlap CA, Bowman MJ, Schisler DA, Rooney AP. Genome analysis shows Bacillus axarquiensis is not a later heterotypic synonym of Bacillus mojavensis; reclassification of Bacillus malacitensis and Brevibacterium halotolerans as heterotypic synonyms of Bacillus axarquiensis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:2438-2443.
Oren A, Garrity GM. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 66, part 6 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:3765-3767. Notes:
🫂 Emendation accompanied by 3 proposals regarding the synonymy of the species.
Notes:
⏲ According to Dunlap et al. (2016), this species is not a later heterotypic synonym of Bacillusmojavensis Roberts et al. 1994.Publication:
Dunlap CA, Bowman MJ, Schisler DA, Rooney AP. Genome analysis shows Bacillus axarquiensis is not a later heterotypic synonym of Bacillus mojavensis; reclassification of Bacillus malacitensis and Brevibacterium halotolerans as heterotypic synonyms of Bacillus axarquiensis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:2438-2443.
⏲ According to Tindall (2017), this species is a later heterotypic synonym of "Bacillushalotolerans" (Delaporte and Sasson 1967) Ben-Gad and Gerchman 2017.Publication:
Tindall BJ. The consequences of Bacillus axarquiensis Ruiz-Garcia et al. 2005, Bacillus malacitensis Ruiz-Garcia et al. 2005 and Brevibacterium halotolerans Delaporte and Sasson 1967 (Approved Lists 1980) being treated as heterotypic synonyms. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:175-176.
⏲ According to Tindall (2017), this species is a later heterotypic synonym of Brevibacteriumhalotolerans Delaporte and Sasson 1967 (Approved Lists 1980).Publication:
Tindall BJ. The consequences of Bacillus axarquiensis Ruiz-Garcia et al. 2005, Bacillus malacitensis Ruiz-Garcia et al. 2005 and Brevibacterium halotolerans Delaporte and Sasson 1967 (Approved Lists 1980) being treated as heterotypic synonyms. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:175-176.
⏲ According to Tindall (2017), this species is a later heterotypic synonym of Bacillushalotolerans (Delaporte and Sasson 1967) Tindall 2017.Publication:
Tindall BJ. The consequences of Bacillus axarquiensis Ruiz-Garcia et al. 2005, Bacillus malacitensis Ruiz-Garcia et al. 2005 and Brevibacterium halotolerans Delaporte and Sasson 1967 (Approved Lists 1980) being treated as heterotypic synonyms. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:175-176.
⏲ According to Wang et al. (2007), this species is a later heterotypic synonym of Bacillusmojavensis Roberts et al. 1994.Publication:
Wang LT, Lee FL, Tai CJ, Yokota A, Kuo HP. Reclassification of Bacillus axarquiensis Ruiz-Garcia et al. 2005 and Bacillus malacitensis Ruiz-Garcia et al. 2005 as later heterotypic synonyms of Bacillus mojavensis Roberts et al. 1994. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:1663-1667.
⏰ According to Dunlap et al. (2016), this species is an earlier heterotypic synonym of Bacillusmalacitensis Ruiz-García et al. 2005.Publication:
Dunlap CA, Bowman MJ, Schisler DA, Rooney AP. Genome analysis shows Bacillus axarquiensis is not a later heterotypic synonym of Bacillus mojavensis; reclassification of Bacillus malacitensis and Brevibacterium halotolerans as heterotypic synonyms of Bacillus axarquiensis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:2438-2443.
⏰ According to Dunlap et al. (2016), this species is an earlier heterotypic synonym of "Bacillushalotolerans" (Delaporte and Sasson 1967) Ben-Gad and Gerchman 2017 but this is in conflict with the rules of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes.Publication:
Dunlap CA, Bowman MJ, Schisler DA, Rooney AP. Genome analysis shows Bacillus axarquiensis is not a later heterotypic synonym of Bacillus mojavensis; reclassification of Bacillus malacitensis and Brevibacterium halotolerans as heterotypic synonyms of Bacillus axarquiensis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:2438-2443.
⏰ According to Dunlap et al. (2016), this species is an earlier heterotypic synonym of Brevibacteriumhalotolerans Delaporte and Sasson 1967 (Approved Lists 1980) but this is in conflict with the rules of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes.Publication:
Dunlap CA, Bowman MJ, Schisler DA, Rooney AP. Genome analysis shows Bacillus axarquiensis is not a later heterotypic synonym of Bacillus mojavensis; reclassification of Bacillus malacitensis and Brevibacterium halotolerans as heterotypic synonyms of Bacillus axarquiensis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:2438-2443.
⏰ According to Dunlap et al. (2016), this species is an earlier heterotypic synonym of Bacillushalotolerans (Delaporte and Sasson 1967) Tindall 2017 but this is in conflict with the rules of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes.Publication:
Dunlap CA, Bowman MJ, Schisler DA, Rooney AP. Genome analysis shows Bacillus axarquiensis is not a later heterotypic synonym of Bacillus mojavensis; reclassification of Bacillus malacitensis and Brevibacterium halotolerans as heterotypic synonyms of Bacillus axarquiensis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:2438-2443.
❗ Bacillusaxarquiensis is the correct name instead if this species is regarded as a separate species (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another species whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority) within a separate genus Bacillus.
😷 The risk group for Germany has been imported on 2023-10-29. The full classification is: risk group = 1. — If in doubt, use the risk group given in the regulations for your country and, if these are not available, use the risk group given in the catalogue of the culture collection from which you have obtained or intend to obtain the strain.
🎓 Name mentioned 11 times in PubMed until 2024-03-27.