Name: Chitinophaga niabensis Weon et al. 2009

Category: Species

Proposed as: sp. nov.

Etymology: niab.en’sis. N.L. masc./fem. adj. niabensis, pertaining to NIAB, the National Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology (Suwon, Republic of Korea), where taxonomic studies were conducted

Gender: feminine

Type strain: DSM 24787; JCM 15440; JS13-10; KACC 12952

See detailed strain information at

Conduct genome-based taxonomy at

16S rRNA gene: EU714259 Analyse FASTA

Valid publication: Weon HY, Yoo SH, Kim YJ, Son JA, Kim BY, Kwon SW, Koo BS. Chitinophaga niabensis sp. nov. and Chitinophaga niastensis sp. nov., isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:1267-1271.

IJSEM list: Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 59, part 6 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:2131-2132.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: correct name

Risk group: 1

• Emendations:
  • Proença et al. 2014 Proenca DN, Nobre MF, Morais PV. Chitinophaga costaii sp. nov., an endophyte of Pinus pinaster, and emended description of Chitinophaga niabensis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:1237-1243. Oren A, Garrity GM. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 64, part 4 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:2188-2190.
    Notes:
    • 😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Using the term "phylogenetic data" (or equivalent) for sequence data is not advocated. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details.

• Notes:
  • 😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. The term "phylogenetic definition" is not recommended. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details. Publication: Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281.
  • 😷 The risk group for Canada has been imported on 2024-02-27. The full classification is: risk group = 1, note = "Animal classification RG: 1 - Security sensitive biological agent: No - Terrestrial animal pathogen under Canadian Food Inspection Agency authority: No - Containment level: Containment Level 1". — The risk group for Germany has been imported on 2023-10-29. The full classification is: risk group = 1.
  • 🎓 Name mentioned 10 times in PubMed until 2024-03-28.
  • 🧍 The distinct name Chitinophaga niastensis from the same publication has a similar spelling. Publication: Angell RC, Freund GE, Willett P. Automatic spelling correction using a trigram similarity measure. Information Processing and Management 1983; 19:255-261.
  • 🧍 The genome of the type strain was sequenced as part of the GEBA (Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea) project. Publication: Garcia-Lopez M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Tindall BJ, Gronow S, Woyke T, Kyrpides NC, Hahnke RL, Goker M. Analysis of 1,000 Type-Strain Genomes Improves Taxonomic Classification of Bacteroidetes. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:2083.

Parent taxon: Chitinophaga Sangkhobol and Skerman 1981

Assigned by: Weon HY, Yoo SH, Kim YJ, Son JA, Kim BY, Kwon SW, Koo BS. Chitinophaga niabensis sp. nov. and Chitinophaga niastensis sp. nov., isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:1267-1271.

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/species/chitinophaga-niabensisCopy to clipboardLink copied to clipboard

Record number: 787912