Species Chitinophaga niabensis
Name: Chitinophaga niabensis Weon et al. 2009
Etymology: niab.en’sis. N.L. masc./fem. adj. niabensis, pertaining to NIAB, the National Institute of Agricultural Biotechnology (Suwon, Republic of Korea), where taxonomic studies were conducted
Type strain: DSM 24787; JCM 15440; JS13-10; KACC 12952
See detailed strain information at
Conduct genome-based taxonomy at
16S rRNA gene:
EU714259
Analyse
FASTA 
Valid publication:
Weon HY, Yoo SH, Kim YJ, Son JA, Kim BY, Kwon SW, Koo BS. Chitinophaga niabensis sp. nov. and Chitinophaga niastensis sp. nov., isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:1267-1271. 
IJSEM list:
Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 59, part 6 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:2131-2132.
Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP
Taxonomic status: correct name
-
Emendations:
-
Proença et al. 2014
Proenca DN, Nobre MF, Morais PV. Chitinophaga costaii sp. nov., an endophyte of Pinus pinaster, and emended description of Chitinophaga niabensis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:1237-1243.
Oren A, Garrity GM. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 64, part 4 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:2188-2190.
Notes:- The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Using the term "phylogenetic data" (or equivalent) for sequence data is not advocated. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details.
-
Proença et al. 2014
Proenca DN, Nobre MF, Morais PV. Chitinophaga costaii sp. nov., an endophyte of Pinus pinaster, and emended description of Chitinophaga niabensis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:1237-1243.
-
Notes:
- The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. The term "phylogenetic definition" is not recommended. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details. Publication: Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281.
-
The distinct name Chitinophaga niastensis from the same publication has a similar spelling.
Publication:
Angell RC, Freund GE, Willett P. Automatic spelling correction using a trigram similarity measure. Information Processing and Management 1983; 19:255-261.
-
The genome of the type strain was sequenced as part of the GEBA (Genomic Encyclopedia of Bacteria and Archaea) project.
Publication:
Garcia-Lopez M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Tindall BJ, Gronow S, Woyke T, Kyrpides NC, Hahnke RL, Goker M. Analysis of 1,000 Type-Strain Genomes Improves Taxonomic Classification of Bacteroidetes. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:2083.
Parent taxon: Chitinophaga Sangkhobol and Skerman 1981
Assigned by:
Weon HY, Yoo SH, Kim YJ, Son JA, Kim BY, Kwon SW, Koo BS. Chitinophaga niabensis sp. nov. and Chitinophaga niastensis sp. nov., isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:1267-1271.
Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/species/chitinophaga-niabensisLink copied to clipboard
Record number: 787912
This LPSN page was printed on 2023-02-05 19:52:12