Name: Erythrobacter odishensis Subhash et al. 2013

Category: Species

Proposed as: sp. nov.

Etymology: o.dish.en’sis. N.L. masc. adj. odishensis, of or belonging to Odisha, a coastal state in India rich in bacterial diversity

Gender: masculine

Type strain: JA747; KCTC 23981; NBRC 108930

See detailed strain information at

Conduct genome-based taxonomy at

16S rRNA gene: HE680094 Analyse FASTA

Valid publication: Subhash Y, Tushar L, Sasikala Ch, Ramana ChV. Erythrobacter odishensis sp. nov. and Pontibacter odishensis sp. nov. isolated from dry soil of a solar saltern. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:4524-4532.

IJSEM list: Oren A, Garrity GM. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 63, part 12 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:697-699.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: synonym

Correct name: Aurantiacibacter odishensis (Subhash et al. 2013) Xu et al. 2020

Risk group: 1

• Synonyms:

  • Name	Kind
    Aurantiacibacter odishensis (Subhash et al. 2013) Xu et al. 2020	homotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP

• Emendations:
  • Hördt et al. 2020 Hordt A, Lopez MG, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Schleuning M, Weinhold LM, Tindall BJ, Gronow S, Kyrpides NC, Woyke T, Goker M. Analysis of 1,000+ Type-Strain Genomes Substantially Improves Taxonomic Classification of Alphaproteobacteria. Front Microbiol 2020; 11:468. Oren A, Garrity GM. List of changes in taxonomic opinion no. 32. Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:4061-4090.

• Notes:
  • 😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details. Publication: Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281.
  • ❗ Erythrobacter odishensis is the correct name instead if this species is regarded as a separate species (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another species whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority) within a separate genus Erythrobacter.
  • 😷 The risk group for Germany has been imported on 2023-10-29. The full classification is: risk group = 1. — If in doubt, use the risk group given in the regulations for your country and, if these are not available, use the risk group given in the catalogue of the culture collection from which you have obtained or intend to obtain the strain.
  • 🎓 Name mentioned 3 times in PubMed until 2024-03-27.

Parent taxon: Erythrobacter Shiba and Simidu 1982

Assigned by: Subhash Y, Tushar L, Sasikala Ch, Ramana ChV. Erythrobacter odishensis sp. nov. and Pontibacter odishensis sp. nov. isolated from dry soil of a solar saltern. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:4524-4532.

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/species/erythrobacter-odishensisCopy to clipboardLink copied to clipboard

Record number: 791364