Name: Gaetbulicola byunsanensis Yoon et al. 2010

Category: Species

Proposed as: sp. nov.

Etymology: by.un.sa.nen’sis. N.L. masc. adj. byunsanensis, of Byunsan, where the type strain was isolated

Pronunciation (Latin), gender: … by-un-sa-NEN-sis, masculine

Type strain: CCUG 57612; DSM 28225; KCTC 22632; SMK-114

See detailed strain information at

16S rRNA gene: FJ467624 Analyse FASTA

Valid publication: Yoon JH, Kang SJ, Jung YT, Oh TK. Gaetbulicola byunsanensis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from tidal flat sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:196-199. 🇰🇷

IJSEM list: Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 60, part 1 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:719-720.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: synonym

Correct name: Marivita byunsanensis (Yoon et al. 2010) Yoon et al. 2012

Risk group: 1

• Synonyms:

  • Name	Kind
    Marivita byunsanensis (Yoon et al. 2010) Yoon et al. 2012	homotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP

• Notes:
  • 🥇 Nomenclatural type of the genus Gaetbulicola Yoon et al. 2010. Publication: Yoon JH, Kang SJ, Jung YT, Oh TK. Gaetbulicola byunsanensis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from tidal flat sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:196-199. 🇰🇷
  • 😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Using the term "phylogenetic data" (or equivalent) for sequence data is not advocated. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details. Publication: Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281. 🇬🇧
  • ❗ Gaetbulicola byunsanensis is the correct name instead if this species is regarded as a separate species (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another species whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority) within a separate genus Gaetbulicola.
  • 😷 The risk group for Germany has been imported on 2023-10-29. The full classification is: risk group = 1. — If in doubt, use the risk group given in the regulations for your country and, if these are not available, use the risk group given in the catalogue of the culture collection from which you have obtained or intend to obtain the strain.
  • 🎓 Name mentioned 2 times in PubMed until 2025-06-04.
  • 🧍 In the April 2012 issue of the IJSEM, Yoon et al. propose to transfer Gaetbulicola byunsanensis Yoon et al. 2010 in the genus Marivita as Marivita byunsanensis (Yoon et al. 2010) Yoon et al. 2012, comb. nov. However, the type strain is not cited in the description of the new combination ("protologue"). So, according to Rules 16, 27(3) and 30(3b), the name Marivita byunsanensis is not validly published. Publication: Oren A, Arahal DR, Goker M, Moore ERB, Rossello-Mora R, Sutcliffe IC. International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Prokaryotic Code (2022 Revision). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:5585. 🇮🇱

Parent taxon: Gaetbulicola Yoon et al. 2010

Assigned by: Yoon JH, Kang SJ, Jung YT, Oh TK. Gaetbulicola byunsanensis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from tidal flat sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:196-199. 🇰🇷

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/species/gaetbulicola-byunsanensisCopy to clipboardLink copied to clipboard

Record number: 788325