Name: Giesbergeria anulus (Williams and Rittenberg 1957) Grabovich et al. 2006

Category: Species

Proposed as: comb. nov.

Basonym: "Spirillum anulus" Williams and Rittenberg 1957

Etymology: an’u.lus. L. masc. n. anulus, a ring (nominative in apposition)

Gender: feminine

Type strain: ATCC 35958; CCUG 49446; IAM 14948; IFO 14917; JCM 21430; NBRC 14917; NCIB 9012; NCIMB 9012

See detailed strain information at

Conduct genome-based taxonomy at

16S rRNA gene: AB074527 Analyse FASTA

Valid publication: Grabovich M, Gavrish E, Kuever J, Lysenko AM, Podkopaeva D, Dubinina G. Proposal of Giesbergeria voronezhensis gen. nov., sp. nov. and G. kuznetsovii sp. nov. and reclassification of [Aquaspirillum] anulus, [A.] sinuosum and [A.] giesbergeri as Giesbergeria anulus comb. nov., G. sinuosa comb. nov. and G. giesbergeri comb. nov., and [Aquaspirillum] metamorphum and [A.] psychrophilum as Simplicispira metamorpha gen. nov., comb. nov. and S. psychrophila comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:569-576.

IJSEM list: Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 56, part 3 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:1181-1182.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: correct name

Risk group: 1

• Synonyms:

  • Name	Kind
    "Spirillum anulus" Williams and Rittenberg 1957	homotypic synonym, not validly published, basonym of name in Approved Lists
    Aquaspirillum anulus (Williams and Rittenberg 1957) Hylemon et al. 1973 (Approved Lists 1980)	homotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP

• Notes:
  • 😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Using the term "phylogenetic data" (or equivalent) for sequence data is not advocated. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details. Publication: Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281.
  • 😷 The risk group for Canada has been imported on 2024-02-27. The full classification is: risk group = 1, note = "Animal classification RG: 1 - Security sensitive biological agent: No - Terrestrial animal pathogen under Canadian Food Inspection Agency authority: No - Containment level: Containment Level 1". — The risk group for Germany has been imported on 2023-10-29. The full classification is: risk group = 1. — If in doubt, use the risk group given in the regulations for your country and, if these are not available, use the risk group given in the catalogue of the culture collection from which you have obtained or intend to obtain the strain.
  • 🎓 Name mentioned 1 time in PubMed until 2024-03-28.
  • 🧍 In the paper by Grabovich et al. 2006, the type strain NCIMB 9012 is erroneously cited as NCIB 9012. Publication: . Erratum. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2006; 56:1179.

Parent taxon: Giesbergeria Grabovich et al. 2006

Assigned by: Grabovich M, Gavrish E, Kuever J, Lysenko AM, Podkopaeva D, Dubinina G. Proposal of Giesbergeria voronezhensis gen. nov., sp. nov. and G. kuznetsovii sp. nov. and reclassification of [Aquaspirillum] anulus, [A.] sinuosum and [A.] giesbergeri as Giesbergeria anulus comb. nov., G. sinuosa comb. nov. and G. giesbergeri comb. nov., and [Aquaspirillum] metamorphum and [A.] psychrophilum as Simplicispira metamorpha gen. nov., comb. nov. and S. psychrophila comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:569-576.

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/species/giesbergeria-anulusCopy to clipboardLink copied to clipboard

Record number: 783906