Name: "Novosphingobiummississippiense" Ali and Boudreau 2026
Category: Species
Proposed as: sp. nov.
Etymology:
mis.sis.sip.pi.en’se. N.L. neut. adj.mississippiense, pertaining to Mississippi, the state where the soil sample source of the type strain, a potted tomato plant, was grown
Original publication:
Ali T, Boudreau PD. Isolation and characterization of Novosphingobium oxfordense sp. nov. and Novosphingobium mississippiense sp. nov. from soil, with LC-MS/MS and genome-based investigation of their glycosphingolipid production. Front Microbiol 2026; 17:1862985. 🇺🇸
Nomenclatural status:
not validly published
Taxonomic status:
preferred name (not correct name)
Notes:
😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details.Publication:
Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281. 🇬🇧
Assigned by:
Ali T, Boudreau PD. Isolation and characterization of Novosphingobium oxfordense sp. nov. and Novosphingobium mississippiense sp. nov. from soil, with LC-MS/MS and genome-based investigation of their glycosphingolipid production. Front Microbiol 2026; 17:1862985. 🇺🇸
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.72809Link copied to clipboard