Etymology:
ra.mo’sa. L. fem. adj.ramosa, much-branched
Gender:
feminine
Type strain:
description; the description of Metchnikoff 1888, as amended by Starr et al. 1983, serving as type
Effective publication:
Metchnikoff E. Pasteuria ramosa un représentant des bactéries à division longitudinale. Annales de l'Institut Pasteur (Paris) 1888; 2:165-170.
IJSEM list:
Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Approved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225-420.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP, conserved name
Taxonomic status:
correct name
Risk group:
1
Emendations:
Starr et al. 1983
Starr MP, Sayre RM, Schmidt JM. Assignment of ATCC 27377 to Planctomyces staleyi sp. nov. and conservation of Pasteuria ramosa Metchnikoff 1888 on the basis of type descriptive materiel. Request for an opinion. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1983; 33:666-671.
Notes:
🥇 Nomenclatural type of the genus Pasteuria Metchnikoff 1888 (Approved Lists 1980).Publication:
Metchnikoff E. Pasteuria ramosa un représentant des bactéries à division longitudinale. Annales de l'Institut Pasteur (Paris) 1888; 2:165-170.
😷 The risk group for Canada has been imported on 2024-02-27. The full classification is: risk group = 1, note = "Security sensitive biological agent: No - Terrestrial animal pathogen under Canadian Food Inspection Agency authority: No". — The risk group for Swiss Confederation has been imported on 2024-02-01. The full classification is: risk group = 1. — The risk group for Germany has been imported on 2023-10-29. The full classification is: risk group = 1.
🎓 Name mentioned 136 times in PubMed until 2024-03-28.
🧍 According to Yarza et al. (2013), an "un-sequenced orphan species where descriptions, illustrations or dead preserved material serve as the type [...]; the description of Metchnikoff 1888, as amended by Starr et al. 1983, serving as type.".Publication:
Yarza P, Sproer C, Swiderski J, Mrotzek N, Spring S, Tindall BJ, Gronow S, Pukall R, Klenk HP, Lang E, et al. Sequencing orphan species initiative (SOS): Filling the gaps in the 16S rRNA gene sequence database for all species with validly published names. Syst Appl Microbiol 2013; 36:69-73.
🧍 Conserved name (Judicial Opinion 61). No type strain available: Pasteuria ramosa was conserved with the description of Metchnikoff 1888 serving as type.Publication:
Judicial Commission. Judicial Opinion No. 61. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1986; 36:119.
🧍 Hereafter, the strain ATCC 27377 has been assigned to a new genus, Pirella Schlesner and Hirsch 1984, as Pirella staleyi Schlesner and Hirsch 1984 [1]. However, the name Pirella is not in accordance with the rules of the ICNP because of precedence of the fungal genus Pirella [Rule 51b(4)]. Consequently, a new genus designation Pirellula Schlesner and Hirsch 1987 and a new species designation Pirellula staleyi (Schlesner and Hirsch 1984) Schlesner and Hirsch 1987 have been proposed by Schlesner and Hirsch 1987 [2].Publication:
Schlesner H, Hirsch P. Assignment of ATCC 27377 to Pirella gen. nov. as Pirella staleyi comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1984; 34:492-495.
🧍 The Judicial Commission declined to give an opinion on the taxonomic position of strain ATCC 27377 because that is a question of taxonomy rather than nomenclature (see: Judicial Opinion 61).Publication:
Judicial Commission. Judicial Opinion No. 61. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1986; 36:119.
Assigned by:
Metchnikoff E. Pasteuria ramosa un représentant des bactéries à division longitudinale. Annales de l'Institut Pasteur (Paris) 1888; 2:165-170.
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/species/pasteuria-ramosaLink copied to clipboard