Name:Prauserellacavernicola Suriyachadkun et al. 2021
Proposed as: sp. nov.
ca.ver.ni’co.la. L. fem. n.caverna, a cave; L. masc./fem. n. suff.-cola, dweller; from L. masc./fem. n.incola, inhabitant, dweller; N.L. masc./fem. n.cavernicola, a cave dweller, referring to the site from which the type strain was isolated
Suriyachadkun C, Ngaemthao W, Pujchakarn T, Mhuantong W, Chunhametha S. Prauserella cavernicola sp. nov., isolated from cave rock. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:5107.
Oren A, Garrity GM. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 71, part 11 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:5196.
validly published under the ICNP
The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details.Publication:
Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281.