Name: Pseudochryseolinea flava (Wang et al. 2018) Wang et al. 2022

Category: Species

Proposed as: comb. nov.

Basonym: Chryseolinea flava Wang et al. 2018

Etymology: fla’va. L. fem. adj. flava, yellow, the colour of colonies and pigments of the bacterium

Gender: feminine

Type strain: CGMCC 1.13492; JCM 32520; SDU1-6

See detailed strain information at

Conduct genome-based taxonomy at

16S rRNA gene: MG662377 Analyse FASTA

Valid publication: Wang C, Lv Y, Li A, Yao Q, Zhu H. Parachryseolinea silvisoli gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from forest soil, and reclassification of Chryseolinea flava as Pseudochryseolinea flava gen. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:5523.

IJSEM list: Oren A, Göker M. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 72, part 10 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:5736.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: synonym

Correct name: Chryseolinea flava Wang et al. 2018

• Synonyms:

  • Name	Kind
    Chryseolinea flava Wang et al. 2018	homotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP

• Notes:
  • 🥇 Nomenclatural type of the genus Pseudochryseolinea Wang et al. 2022. Publication: Wang C, Lv Y, Li A, Yao Q, Zhu H. Parachryseolinea silvisoli gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from forest soil, and reclassification of Chryseolinea flava as Pseudochryseolinea flava gen. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:5523.
  • 😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Using the term "phylogenetic data" (or equivalent) for sequence data is not advocated. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details. Publication: Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281.
  • ❗ Pseudochryseolinea flava is the correct name instead if this species is regarded as a separate species (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another species whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority) within a separate genus Pseudochryseolinea.
  • 🎓 Name mentioned 1 time in PubMed until 2024-03-27.

Parent taxon: Pseudochryseolinea Wang et al. 2022

Assigned by: Wang C, Lv Y, Li A, Yao Q, Zhu H. Parachryseolinea silvisoli gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from forest soil, and reclassification of Chryseolinea flava as Pseudochryseolinea flava gen. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:5523.

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/species/pseudochryseolinea-flavaCopy to clipboardLink copied to clipboard

Record number: 30266