Species Pseudomonas aestusnigri

Name: Pseudomonas aestusnigri Sánchez et al. 2014

Category: Species

Proposed as: sp. nov.

Etymology: aes.tus.ni’gri. L. masc. n. aestus, tide (also as genitive); L. adj. niger -gra -grum, black; N.L. gen. masc. n. aestusnigri, of black tide

Gender: feminine

Type strain: CCUG 64165; CECT 8317; VGXO14

Conduct genome-based taxonomy at

16S rRNA gene: HG004394 Analyse FASTA

Effective publication: Sanchez D, Mulet M, Rodriguez AC, David Z, Lalucat J, Garcia-Valdes E. Pseudomonas aestusnigri sp. nov., isolated from crude oil-contaminated intertidal sand samples after the Prestige oil spill. Syst Appl Microbiol 2014; 37:89-94.

IJSEM list: Oren A, Garrity GM. Validation list no. 159. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:2927-2929.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: synonym (and not recommended for medical use)

Correct name: Halopseudomonas aestusnigri (Sánchez et al. 2014) Rudra and Gupta 2021

Risk group: 1

Synonyms:

Name	Kind
Halopseudomonas aestusnigri (Sánchez et al. 2014) Rudra and Gupta 2021	homotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP
Neopseudomonas aestusnigri (Sánchez et al. 2014) Saati-Santamaría et al. 2021	homotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP, illegitimate name

Notes:
- 😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Using the term "phylogenetic data" (or equivalent) for sequence data is not advocated. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details. Publication: Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281.
- ❗ Pseudomonas aestusnigri is the correct name instead if this species is regarded as a separate species (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another species whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority) within a separate genus Pseudomonas.
- 😷 The risk group for Germany has been imported on 2023-10-29. The full classification is: risk group = 1. — If in doubt, use the risk group given in the regulations for your country and, if these are not available, use the risk group given in the catalogue of the culture collection from which you have obtained or intend to obtain the strain.
- 🎓 Name mentioned 7 times in PubMed until 2025-06-04.
- 🙅 This name is on the List of Recommended Names for bacteria of medical importance (LoRN) as a synonym of the name to be applied to this species. The name is on LoRN because of the recorded risk group of other species in the genus.

Parent taxon: Pseudomonas Migula 1894 (Approved Lists 1980)

Assigned by: Sanchez D, Mulet M, Rodriguez AC, David Z, Lalucat J, Garcia-Valdes E. Pseudomonas aestusnigri sp. nov., isolated from crude oil-contaminated intertidal sand samples after the Prestige oil spill. Syst Appl Microbiol 2014; 37:89-94.

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/species/pseudomonas-aestusnigriLink copied to clipboard

Record number: 792090

This LPSN page was printed on 2025-07-10 07:03:50

Subscribe to our newsletter

Species Pseudomonas aestusnigri