Etymology:an.dro.po.go’nis.N.L. masc. n.Andropogon, a botanical generic name of widely distributed grasses; from Gr. masc. n.anêr (gen. andros), man; from Gr. masc. n.pôgôn (gen. pôgônos), beard; N.L. gen. masc. n.andropogonis, of Andropogon
Effective publication:
Stapp C. Schizomycetes (Spaltpilze oder Bakterien). In: Sorauer P (eds), Handbuch der Pflanzenkrankheiten, 5th ed., Vol. 2, Paul Parey, Berlin, 1928, p. 1-295.
IJSEM list:
Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Approved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225-420.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
Taxonomic status:
synonym (and not recommended for medical use)
heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP
Notes:
⏰ According to Coenye et al. (2001), this species is an earlier heterotypic synonym of "Bacteriumwoodsii" Smith 1911.Publication:
Coenye T, Laevens S, Gillis M, Vandamme P. Genotypic and chemotaxonomic evidence for the reclassification of Pseudomonas woodsii (Smith 1911) Stevens 1925 as Burkholderia andropogonis (Smith 1911) Gillis et al. 1995. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:183-185. 🇧🇪
⏰ According to Coenye et al. (2001), this species is an earlier heterotypic synonym of Pseudomonaswoodsii (Smith 1911) Stevens 1925 (Approved Lists 1980).Publication:
Coenye T, Laevens S, Gillis M, Vandamme P. Genotypic and chemotaxonomic evidence for the reclassification of Pseudomonas woodsii (Smith 1911) Stevens 1925 as Burkholderia andropogonis (Smith 1911) Gillis et al. 1995. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:183-185. 🇧🇪
❗ Pseudomonasandropogonis is the correct name instead if this species is regarded as a separate species (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another species whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority) within a separate genus Pseudomonas.
😷 The risk group for Belgium has been imported on 2024-02-01. The full classification is: risk group = 1, note = "plant pathogen - biological class of risk plant: 2". — The risk group for Canada has been imported on 2024-02-27. The full classification is: risk group = 1, note = "Animal classification RG: 1 - Security sensitive biological agent: No - Terrestrial animal pathogen under Canadian Food Inspection Agency authority: No - Containment level: Containment Level 1". — The risk group for Swiss Confederation has been imported on 2024-02-01. The full classification is: risk group = 2, note = "PP". — The risk group for Germany has been imported on 2026-08-13. The full classification is: risk group = 1, note = "p". — If in doubt, use the risk group given in the regulations for your country and, if these are not available, use the risk group given in the catalogue of the culture collection from which you have obtained or intend to obtain the strain.
🎓 Name mentioned 2 times in PubMed until 2026-06-11.
🙅 This name is on the List of Recommended Names for bacteria of medical importance (LoRN) as a synonym of the name to be applied to this species. The name is on LoRN because of the recorded risk group of the species itself.
🧍 On the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names and on the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names (Amended Edition), the page numbers of the paper by Stapp are cited as pp. 758.Publication:
Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Approved lists of bacterial names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225-420.
🧍 Plant pathogenic according to Bull et al. (2007).Publication:
Bull CT, De Boer SH, Denny TP, Firrao G, Fischer Le Saux M, Saddler GS, Scortichini M, Stead DE, Takikawa Y. Comprehensive list of names of plant pathogenic bacteria, 1980-2007. Journal of Plant Pathology 2010; 92:551-592. 🇺🇸
Assigned by:
Stapp C. Schizomycetes (Spaltpilze oder Bakterien). In: Sorauer P (eds), Handbuch der Pflanzenkrankheiten, 5th ed., Vol. 2, Paul Parey, Berlin, 1928, p. 1-295.
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.779954Link copied to clipboard