Name: Pseudoroseomonas cervicalis (Rihs et al. 1998) Rai et al. 2022

Category: Species

Proposed as: comb. nov.

Basonym: Roseomonas cervicalis Rihs et al. 1998

Etymology: cer.vi.ca’lis. L. fem. n. cervix, neck (gen. cervicis); L. masc./fem. adj. suff. -alis, suffix denoting pertaining to; N.L. masc./fem. adj. cervicalis, pertaining to cervix, from the cervix

Gender: feminine

Type strain: ATCC 49957; CIP 104027; strain E7107

Conduct genome-based taxonomy at

16S rRNA gene: AF533353 Analyse FASTA

Effective publication: Rai A, Jagadeeshwari U, Deepshikha G, Smita N, Sasikala C, Ramana CV. Phylotaxogenomics for the Reappraisal of the Genus Roseomonas With the Creation of Six New Genera. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:677842.

IJSEM list: Oren A, Garrity GM. Validation list no. 203. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:5167.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: synonym

Correct name: Roseomonas cervicalis Rihs et al. 1998

• Synonyms:

  • Name	Kind
    Roseomonas cervicalis Rihs et al. 1998	homotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP

• Notes:
  • 🥇 Nomenclatural type of the genus Pseudoroseomonas Rai et al. 2022. Publication: Rai A, Jagadeeshwari U, Deepshikha G, Smita N, Sasikala C, Ramana CV. Phylotaxogenomics for the Reappraisal of the Genus Roseomonas With the Creation of Six New Genera. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:677842.
  • 😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details. Publication: Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281.
  • ❗ Pseudoroseomonas cervicalis is the correct name instead if this species is regarded as a separate species (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another species whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority) within a separate genus Pseudoroseomonas.
  • 😷 The taxon name shown here has no risk group assigned, but is the homotypic synonym of Roseomonas cervicalis Rihs et al. 1998, which has a risk group (Canada) above 1. This may require that the name shown here is not treated as the correct name for practical purposes. — The taxon name shown here has no risk group assigned, but is the homotypic synonym of Roseomonas cervicalis Rihs et al. 1998, which has a risk group (Germany) above 1. This may require that the name shown here is not treated as the correct name for practical purposes.
  • 🎓 Name mentioned 0 times in PubMed until 2024-03-27.

Parent taxon: Pseudoroseomonas Rai et al. 2022

Assigned by: Rai A, Jagadeeshwari U, Deepshikha G, Smita N, Sasikala C, Ramana CV. Phylotaxogenomics for the Reappraisal of the Genus Roseomonas With the Creation of Six New Genera. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:677842.

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/species/pseudoroseomonas-cervicalisCopy to clipboardLink copied to clipboard

Record number: 26679