Species Pseudoroseomonas globiformis

Name: Pseudoroseomonas globiformis (Fang et al. 2018) Rai et al. 2022

Category, proposed as: species, comb. nov.

Basonym: Roseomonas globiformis Fang et al. 2018

Etymology: glo.bi.for’mis. L. masc. n. globus, sphere; L. fem. n. forma, shape; N.L. fem. adj. globiformis, of spherical shape

Pronunciation (Latin), gender: pse͡u-do-ro-se-O-mo-nas glo-bi-FOR-mis, feminine

Type strain: CPCC 100847; DSM 102171; KCTC 52094

See detailed strain information at

Conduct genome-based taxonomy at

16S rRNA gene: MG589944 Analyse FASTA

Effective publication: Rai A, Jagadeeshwari U, Deepshikha G, Smita N, Sasikala C, Ramana CV. Phylotaxogenomics for the Reappraisal of the Genus Roseomonas With the Creation of Six New Genera. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:677842. 🇮🇳

IJSEM list: Oren A, Garrity GM. Validation list no. 203. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:5167.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: synonym (and not recommended for medical use)

Correct name: Teichococcus globiformis (Fang et al. 2018) Liu and Xin 2025

Risk group: 1

• Synonyms:

  • Name	Kind
    Teichococcus globiformis (Fang et al. 2018) Liu and Xin 2025	homotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP
    Roseomonas globiformis Fang et al. 2018	homotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP

• Notes:
  • 😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details. Publication: Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281. 🇬🇧
  • ❗ Pseudoroseomonas globiformis is the correct name instead if this species is regarded as a separate species (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another species whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority) within a separate genus Pseudoroseomonas.
  • 😷 The risk group for Germany has been imported on 2026-08-13. The full classification is: risk group = 1. — If in doubt, use the risk group given in the regulations for your country and, if these are not available, use the risk group given in the catalogue of the culture collection from which you have obtained or intend to obtain the strain.
  • 🎓 Name mentioned 0 times in PubMed until 2026-06-11.
  • 🙅 This name is on the List of Recommended Names for bacteria of medical importance (LoRN) as a synonym of the name to be applied to this species. The name is on LoRN because of the recorded risk group of the genus.

Parent taxon: Pseudoroseomonas Rai et al. 2022

Assigned by: Rai A, Jagadeeshwari U, Deepshikha G, Smita N, Sasikala C, Ramana CV. Phylotaxogenomics for the Reappraisal of the Genus Roseomonas With the Creation of Six New Genera. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:677842. 🇮🇳

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.26577Copy to clipboardLink copied to clipboard

Record number: 26577