Name:Rhodopseudomonasparapalustris Venkata Ramana et al. 2012
Category: Species
Proposed as: sp. nov.
Etymology:pa.ra.pa.lus’tris.Gr. prep.para, alongside of, resembling; L. masc./fem. adj.palustris, marshy, and also a bacterial epithet; N.L. fem. adj.parapalustris, resembling Rhodopseudomonas palustris
Valid publication:
Ramana VV, Chakravarthy SK, Raj PS, Kumar BV, Shobha E, Ramaprasad EV, Sasikala Ch, Ramana ChV. Descriptions of Rhodopseudomonas parapalustris sp. nov., Rhodopseudomonas harwoodiae sp. nov. and Rhodopseudomonas pseudopalustris sp. nov., and emended description of Rhodopseudomonas palustris. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:1790-1798. 🇮🇳
IJSEM list:
Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 62, part 8 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:2555-2556.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
Taxonomic status:
correct name
Risk group:
1
Notes:
😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details.Publication:
Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281. 🇬🇧
😷 The risk group for Germany has been imported on 2023-10-29. The full classification is: risk group = 1. — If in doubt, use the risk group given in the regulations for your country and, if these are not available, use the risk group given in the catalogue of the culture collection from which you have obtained or intend to obtain the strain.
🎓 Name mentioned 2 times in PubMed until 2026-06-11.