×

Rate our new design

Note: You may need to press Ctrl+F5 or so in your browser to fully load the new page.

Thank you!

Species Roseomonas aquatica

Name: Roseomonas aquatica Gallego et al. 2006

Category, proposed as: species, sp. nov.

Etymology: a.qua’ti.ca. L. fem. adj. aquatica, found in water, aquatic

Pronunciation (Latin), gender: ro-se-O-mo-nas a-KWA-ti-ka, feminine

Type strain: CECT 7131; DSM 19438; JCM 13556; TR53

16S rRNA gene: AM231587 Analysetree FASTA download

Valid publication: Gallego V, Sanchez-Porro C, Garcia MT, Ventosa A. Roseomonas aquatica sp. nov., isolated from drinking water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:2291-2295. 🇪🇸

IJSEM list: Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 56, part 10 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2-3.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: synonym (and not recommended for medical use)

Correct name: Paeniroseomonas aquatica (Gallego et al. 2006) Rai et al. 2022

Risk group: 1

  • Emendations:
    • Sánchez-Porro et al. 2009 Sanchez-Porro C, Gallego V, Busse HJ, Kampfer P, Ventosa A. Transfer of Teichococcus ludipueritiae and Muricoccus roseus to the genus Roseomonas, as Roseomonas ludipueritiae comb. nov. and Roseomonas rosea comb. nov., respectively, and emended description of the genus Roseomonas. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:1193-1198. 🇪🇸 Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 59, part 5 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:1853-1855.
  • Notes:
    • 😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Using the term "phylogenetic data" (or equivalent) for sequence data is not advocated. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details. Publication: Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281. 🇬🇧
    • ❗ Roseomonas aquatica is the correct name instead if this species is regarded as a separate species (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another species whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority) within a separate genus Roseomonas.
    • 😷 The risk group for Germany has been imported on 2026-08-13. The full classification is: risk group = 1. — If in doubt, use the risk group given in the regulations for your country and, if these are not available, use the risk group given in the catalogue of the culture collection from which you have obtained or intend to obtain the strain.
    • 🎓 Name mentioned 5 times in PubMed until 2026-06-11.
    • 🙅 This name is on the List of Recommended Names for bacteria of medical importance (LoRN) as a synonym of the name to be applied to this species. The name is on LoRN because of the recorded risk group of the genus.

Parent taxon: Roseomonas Rihs et al. 1998

Assigned by: Gallego V, Sanchez-Porro C, Garcia MT, Ventosa A. Roseomonas aquatica sp. nov., isolated from drinking water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:2291-2295. 🇪🇸

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.785583Link copied to clipboard

Record number: 785583