×

Rate our new design

Note: You may need to press Ctrl+F5 or so in your browser to fully load the new page.

Thank you!

Species Roseomonas vinacea

Name: Roseomonas vinacea Zhang et al. 2008

Category, proposed as: species, sp. nov.

Etymology: vi.na’ce.a. L. fem. adj. vinacea, of or belonging to wine or to the grape, referring to the colony colour

Pronunciation (Latin), gender: ro-se-O-mo-nas wi-NA-ke-a, feminine

Type strain: CCM 7468; CPCC 100056; DSM 19362; KCTC 22045

16S rRNA gene: EF368368 Analysetree FASTA download

Valid publication: Zhang YQ, Yu LY, Wang D, Liu HY, Sun CH, Jiang W, Zhang YQ, Li WJ. Roseomonas vinacea sp. nov., a Gram-negative coccobacillus isolated from a soil sample. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:2070-2074. 🇨🇳

IJSEM list: Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 58, part 9 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:2675-2676.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: synonym (and not recommended for medical use)

Correct name: Muricoccus vinaceus (Zhang et al. 2008) Liu and Xin 2025

Risk group: 1

  • Emendations:
    • Hördt et al. 2020 Hordt A, Lopez MG, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Schleuning M, Weinhold LM, Tindall BJ, Gronow S, Kyrpides NC, Woyke T, Goker M. Analysis of 1,000+ Type-Strain Genomes Substantially Improves Taxonomic Classification of Alphaproteobacteria. Front Microbiol 2020; 11:468. 🇩🇪 Oren A, Garrity GM. List of changes in taxonomic opinion no. 32. Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:4061-4090.
  • Notes:
    • 😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Using the term "phylogenetic data" (or equivalent) for sequence data is not advocated. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details. Publication: Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281. 🇬🇧
    • ❗ Roseomonas vinacea is the correct name instead if this species is regarded as a separate species (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another species whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority) within a separate genus Roseomonas.
    • 😷 The risk group for Germany has been imported on 2026-08-13. The full classification is: risk group = 1. — If in doubt, use the risk group given in the regulations for your country and, if these are not available, use the risk group given in the catalogue of the culture collection from which you have obtained or intend to obtain the strain.
    • 🎓 Name mentioned 4 times in PubMed until 2026-06-11.
    • 🙅 This name is on the List of Recommended Names for bacteria of medical importance (LoRN) as a synonym of the name to be applied to this species. The name is on LoRN because of the recorded risk group of the genus.

Parent taxon: Roseomonas Rihs et al. 1998

Assigned by: Zhang YQ, Yu LY, Wang D, Liu HY, Sun CH, Jiang W, Zhang YQ, Li WJ. Roseomonas vinacea sp. nov., a Gram-negative coccobacillus isolated from a soil sample. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:2070-2074. 🇨🇳

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.786347Link copied to clipboard

Record number: 786347