Effective publication:
Oh BS, Kim JS, Yu SY, Ryu SW, Park SH, Kang SW, Park JE, Choi SH, Han KI, Lee KC, et al.Sutterella faecalis sp. nov., isolated from human faeces. J Microbiol 2020; 58:99-104. 🇰🇷
IJSEM list:
Oren A, Göker M. Validation list no. 212. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:5931.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
Taxonomic status:
correct name (and explicitly recommended for medical use)
Notes:
😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Using the term "phylogenetic data" (or equivalent) for sequence data is not advocated. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details.Publication:
Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281. 🇬🇧
🧬 The phylogenomic assignment score of this taxon is 0.16812 (N = 2).
🎓 Name mentioned 2 times in PubMed until 2026-06-11.
🙆 This name is on the List of Recommended Names for bacteria of medical importance (LoRN) as the name to be applied to this species. The name is on LoRN because of the recorded risk group of the genus.
Assigned by:
Oh BS, Kim JS, Yu SY, Ryu SW, Park SH, Kang SW, Park JE, Choi SH, Han KI, Lee KC, et al.Sutterella faecalis sp. nov., isolated from human faeces. J Microbiol 2020; 58:99-104. 🇰🇷
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.39632Link copied to clipboard