Name: Nocardiopsis dassonvillei subsp. crassaminis Camacho Pozo et al. 2020

Category: Subspecies

Proposed as: subsp. nov.

Etymology: cras.sa’mi.nis. L. gen. neut. n. crassaminis, from a sediment

Pronunciation (Latin), gender: no-kar-di-OP-sis das-son-WIL-le-i kras-SA-mi-nis, feminine

Type strain: CECT 30033; D1; LMG 30468

Valid publication: Camacho Pozo MI, Wieme AD, Perez SR, Llaurado Maury G, Snauwaert C, Lescaylle Veranes Y, Pena Zamora L, Schumann P, Vandamme P. Nocardiopsis dassonvillei subsp. crassaminis subsp. nov., isolated from freshwater sediment, and reappraisal of Nocardiopsis alborubida Grund and Kroppenstedt 1990 emend. Nouioui et al. 2018. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:6172-6179. 🇨🇺

IJSEM list: Oren A, Garrity GM. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 70, part 12 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:4656.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: correct name (and explicitly recommended for medical use)

Risk group: 1

• Notes:
  • 😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details. Publication: Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281. 🇬🇧
  • 😷 The risk group for Germany has been imported on 2026-08-13. The full classification is: risk group = 1. — If in doubt, use the risk group given in the regulations for your country and, if these are not available, use the risk group given in the catalogue of the culture collection from which you have obtained or intend to obtain the strain.
  • 🙆 This name is on the List of Recommended Names for bacteria of medical importance (LoRN) as the name to be applied to this subspecies. The name is on LoRN because of the recorded risk group of the genus.

Parent taxon: Nocardiopsis dassonvillei (Brocq-Rousseau 1904) Meyer 1976 (Approved Lists 1980)

Assigned by: Camacho Pozo MI, Wieme AD, Perez SR, Llaurado Maury G, Snauwaert C, Lescaylle Veranes Y, Pena Zamora L, Schumann P, Vandamme P. Nocardiopsis dassonvillei subsp. crassaminis subsp. nov., isolated from freshwater sediment, and reappraisal of Nocardiopsis alborubida Grund and Kroppenstedt 1990 emend. Nouioui et al. 2018. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:6172-6179. 🇨🇺

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.14714Copy to clipboardLink copied to clipboard

Record number: 14714