Etymology:my.co.i’des.Gr. masc. n.mykês (gen. mykêtos), mushroom or other fungus; L. adj. suff.-oides, ressembling, similar; from Gr. neut. adj. suff.-eides, resembling, similar; from Gr. neut. n.eîdos, that which is seen, form, shape, figure; N.L. masc. adj.mycoides, fungus-like
heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP
Emendations:
Liu et al. 2018
Liu Y, Lai Q, Shao Z. Genome analysis-based reclassification of Bacillus weihenstephanensis as a later heterotypic synonym of Bacillus mycoides. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:106-112.
Oren A, Garrity GM. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 68, part 1 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:979-981. Notes:
🫂 Emendation accompanied by a proposal regarding the synonymy of the species.
Notes:
⏰ According to Committee (2025), this species is an earlier heterotypic synonym of Bacillushominis Tohya et al. 2021.Publication:
Committee AH. Mitigating changes in prokaryotic nomenclature: Definitions and Workflow. Zenodo 2025; 2025:15320329.
⏰ According to Liu et al. (2018), this species is an earlier heterotypic synonym of Bacillusweihenstephanensis Lechner et al. 1998.Publication:
Liu Y, Lai Q, Shao Z. Genome analysis-based reclassification of Bacillus weihenstephanensis as a later heterotypic synonym of Bacillus mycoides. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:106-112.
🏢 Synonymy of this taxon was mentioned in an IJSEM list.Publication:
Oren A, Garrity GM. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 68, part 1 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:979-981.
🧬 The phylogenomic assignment score of this taxon is -0.05621 (N = 93).
😷 The risk group for Canada has been imported on 2024-02-27. The full classification is: risk group = 1, note = "Animal classification RG: 1 - Security sensitive biological agent: No - Terrestrial animal pathogen under Canadian Food Inspection Agency authority: No - Containment level: Containment Level 1". — The risk group for Swiss Confederation has been imported on 2024-02-01. The full classification is: risk group = 1. — The risk group for Germany has been imported on 2023-10-29. The full classification is: risk group = 2. — If in doubt, use the risk group given in the regulations for your country and, if these are not available, use the risk group given in the catalogue of the culture collection from which you have obtained or intend to obtain the strain.
🎓 Name mentioned 273 times in PubMed until 2025-06-04.
🙆 This name is on the List of Recommended Names for bacteria of medical importance (LoRN) as the name to be applied to this species. The name is on LoRN because of the recorded risk group of the species itself.
⚠ This name is retained (and recommended for medical use. This will change in the future) instead of Bacillushominis Tohya et al. 2021.Publication:
Tohya M, Hishinuma T, Watanabe S, Shimojima M, Ogawa M, Tada T, Kirikae T. Three novel species of the Bacillus cereus group isolated from clinical samples in Japan. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:4993.
Oren A, Garrity GM. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 71, part 9 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:5130.
🧍 According to Bartlett et al. (2022), this species is an established human pathogen.Publication:
Bartlett A, Padfield D, Lear L, Bendall R, Vos M. A comprehensive list of bacterial pathogens infecting humans. Microbiology (Reading) 2022; 168:0.
🧍 A genome-scale phylogenetic analysis of the Bacillus cereus group was conducted by Liu et al. (2015).Publication:
Liu Y, Lai Q, Goker M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Wang M, Sun Y, Wang L, Shao Z. Genomic insights into the taxonomic status of the Bacillus cereus group. Sci Rep 2015; 5:14082.