Etymology:en.do.phy’ti.ca.Gr. pref.endo-, within; Gr. neut. n.phyton, plant; L. fem. adj. suff.-ica, adjectival suffix used with the sense of belonging to; N.L. fem. adj.endophytica, within plant, endophytic, pertaining to the original isolation from plant tissue
Effective publication:
Garcia-Lopez M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Tindall BJ, Gronow S, Woyke T, Kyrpides NC, Hahnke RL, Goker M. Analysis of 1,000 Type-Strain Genomes Improves Taxonomic Classification of Bacteroidetes. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:2083. 🇩🇪
IJSEM list:
Oren A, Garrity GM. Validation list no. 193. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:2960-2966.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
Taxonomic status:
synonym (and not recommended for medical use)
heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP, distinct rank
Notes:
❗ Elizabethkingiaanophelis subsp. endophytica is the correct name instead if this subspecies is regarded as a separate subspecies (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another subspecies whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority) within a separate species Elizabethkingiaanophelis within a separate genus Elizabethkingia.
😷 The taxon name shown here has no risk group assigned, but is the homotypic synonym of Elizabethkingiaendophytica Kämpfer et al. 2015, which has a risk group (Germany) above 1. This may require that the name shown here is not treated as the correct name for practical purposes.
🙅 This name is on the List of Recommended Names for bacteria of medical importance (LoRN) as a synonym of the name to be applied to this subspecies. The name is on LoRN because of the recorded risk group of the species itself.