Valid publication:
Bornet É, Flahault C. Revision des Nostocacées hétérocystées contenues dans les principaux herbiers de France (Troisième fragment). Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Botanique, Septième série 1886; 5:51-129.
corrected spelling of name, validly published under the ICN (Botanical Code)
Notes:
🚃 The type genus of this tribe has alternatively been placed in the tribe Scytonemateae corrig. Rabenhorst ex Bornet and Flahault 1886.Publication:
Bornet É, Flahault C. Revision des Nostocacées hétérocystées contenues dans les principaux herbiers de France (Troisième fragment). Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Botanique, Septième série 1886; 5:51-129.
🚃 The type genus of this tribe has alternatively been placed in the tribe Scytonemateae corrig. Rabenhorst ex Bornet and Flahault 1886.Publication:
Bornet É, Flahault C. Revision des Nostocacées hétérocystées contenues dans les principaux herbiers de France (deuxième fragment). Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Botanique, Septième Série 1886; 4:343-373.
🙄 This taxon name is occasionally misprinted (or affected by an OCR error) in some sources as: "Sccletonemaceae"; "Scitonemaceae"; "Scutonemaceae"; "Scyionemaceae"; "Scytmwmaceae"; "Scytonemtaceae"; "Scytonenmtaceae"; "Scytonmnataceae"; "Seytonemalaceae"; "Soytonemaceae".
😵 The taxonomic category of this name is not currently in use in the LPSN hierarchy. For this reason, this name does not have a parent taxon and does not have child taxa.
🧍 Irregularly formed name. The expected name to be formed from Scytonema would be "Scytonemataceae" because the genitive of nêma is nêmatos (Latin nematis). See also the discussion in Silva (1980).Publication:
Silva PC. Names of classes and families of living algae with special reference to their use in the Index Nominum Genericorum (Plantarum). Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema, Utrecht, 1980.
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/tribe/scytonemaceaeLink copied to clipboard