heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICN (Botanical Code)
Notes:
🧒 Drouet and Daily (1952) assigned the genus Clastidium Kirchner 1880 to this family.Publication:
Drouet F, Daily WA. A synopsis of the coccoid Myxophyceae. Butler Univ. Bot. Stud. 1952; 10:220-223.
🛺 The type genus of this family has been placed in the family Chamaesiphonaceae Borzì 1878.Publication:
Strunecky O, Ivanova AP, Mares J. An updated classification of cyanobacterial orders and families based on phylogenomic and polyphasic analysis. J Phycol 2023; 59:12-51.
🚃 The type genus of this family has alternatively been placed in the family Dermocarpaceae Geitler 1925.Publication:
Geitler L. Synoptische Darstellung der Cyanophyceen in morphologischer und systematischer Hinsicht. Beihefte zum Botanischen Centralblatt 1925; 41:163-294.
🙄 This taxon name is occasionally misprinted (or affected by an OCR error) in some sources as: "Clastidaceae"; "Clastidtaceae".
❗ Clastidiaceae is the correct name instead if this family is regarded as a separate family (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another family whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority).
🧍 Silva (1980) notes that as circumscribed in the Index Nominum Genericorum, this family includes Dermocarpella, which is the type of Dermocarpellaceae T. Christensen 1978.Publication:
Silva PC. Names of classes and families of living algae with special reference to their use in the Index Nominum Genericorum (Plantarum). Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema, Utrecht, 1980.
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/family/clastidiaceaeLink copied to clipboard