Name: Fundidesulfovibrio Waite et al. 2020

Category: Genus

Proposed as: gen. nov.

Etymology: Fun.di.de.sul.fo.vi’bri.o. L. masc. n. fundus, the bottom, foundation; N.L. masc. n. Desulfovibrio, a bacterial genus name; N.L. masc. n. Fundidesulfovibrio, the bottom Desulfovibrio, referring to the origin from a deep subsurface aquifer

Gender, pronunciation (Latin): masculine (stem: Fundidesulfovibrion-), fun-di-de-sul-fo-WI-bri-o

Type species: Fundidesulfovibrio putealis (Basso et al. 2005) Waite et al. 2020

Conduct genome-based taxonomy of genus at TYGS

16S rRNA gene: Analyse FASTA

Valid publication: Waite DW, Chuvochina M, Pelikan C, Parks DH, Yilmaz P, Wagner M, Loy A, Naganuma T, Nakai R, Whitman WB, et al. Proposal to reclassify the proteobacterial classes Deltaproteobacteria and Oligoflexia, and the phylum Thermodesulfobacteria into four phyla reflecting major functional capabilities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5972-6016. 🇳🇿

IJSEM list: Oren A, Garrity GM. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 70, part 11 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:4645.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: correct name

• Notes:
  • 🚋 The type species of this genus has alternatively been placed in the genus Desulfovibrio Kluyver and van Niel 1936 (Approved Lists 1980). Publication: Basso O, Caumette P, Magot M. Desulfovibrio putealis sp. nov., a novel sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from a deep subsurface aquifer. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:101-104. 🇫🇷
  • 💁 Taxonomists who have recently focused on this group are the corresponding authors of Yang et al. (2023). Editors in search of reviewers are advised to consider additional criteria such as whether a taxon is covered by one of the ICSP subcommittees.
  • 🧬 The phylogenomic assignment score of this taxon is -0.03566 (N = 3).
  • 🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: JCM: 5; GDMCC: 3; DSM: 3; ATCC: 1.
  • 🧍 The distinct name Alteridesulfovibrio from the same publication has a similar spelling. — 🧍 The distinct name Aminidesulfovibrio from the same publication has a similar spelling. — 🧍 The distinct name Frigididesulfovibrio from the same publication has a similar spelling. — 🧍 The distinct name Humidesulfovibrio from the same publication has a similar spelling. — 🧍 The distinct name Maridesulfovibrio from the same publication has a similar spelling. — 🧍 The distinct name Oleidesulfovibrio from the same publication has a similar spelling. — 🧍 The distinct name Paucidesulfovibrio from the same publication has a similar spelling. — 🧍 The distinct name Solidesulfovibrio from the same publication has a similar spelling. Publication: Angell RC, Freund GE, Willett P. Automatic spelling correction using a trigram similarity measure. Information Processing and Management 1983; 19:255-261.

Subdivision:

Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 6
Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 6
Total number of child taxa: 6

• Child taxa:

  • Name	Nomenclatural status	Taxonomic status
    Fundidesulfovibrio agrisoli Yang et al. 2023	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Fundidesulfovibrio butyratiphilus (Suzuki et al. 2010) Galushko and Kuever 2021	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Fundidesulfovibrio magnetotacticus Shimoshige et al. 2022	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Fundidesulfovibrio putealis (Basso et al. 2005) Waite et al. 2020	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Fundidesulfovibrio soli Yang et al. 2023	validly published under the ICNP	correct name
    Fundidesulfovibrio terrae Yang et al. 2023	validly published under the ICNP	correct name

Parent taxon: Desulfovibrionaceae Kuever et al. 2006

Assigned by: Waite DW, Chuvochina M, Pelikan C, Parks DH, Yilmaz P, Wagner M, Loy A, Naganuma T, Nakai R, Whitman WB, et al. Proposal to reclassify the proteobacterial classes Deltaproteobacteria and Oligoflexia, and the phylum Thermodesulfobacteria into four phyla reflecting major functional capabilities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5972-6016. 🇳🇿

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.17397Copy to clipboardLink copied to clipboard

Record number: 17397