Genus Kandleria

Name: Kandleria Salvetti et al. 2011

Category, proposed as: genus, gen. nov.

Etymology: Kan.dle’ri.a. N.L. fem. n. Kandleria, named after Otto Kandler, for his outstanding contribution to the study of lactic acid bacteria and for the first identification of Lactobacillus vitulinus

Gender, pronunciation (Latin): feminine (stem: Kandleri-), kan-DLE-ri-a

Type species: Kandleria vitulina (Sharpe et al. 1973) Salvetti et al. 2011

Conduct genome-based taxonomy of genus at TYGS

16S rRNA gene: Analyse FASTA

Valid publication: Salvetti E, Felis GE, Dellaglio F, Castioni A, Torriani S, Lawson PA. Reclassification of Lactobacillus catenaformis (Eggerth 1935) Moore and Holdeman 1970 and Lactobacillus vitulinus Sharpe et al. 1973 as Eggerthia catenaformis gen. nov., comb. nov. and Kandleria vitulina gen. nov., comb. nov., respectively. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:2520-2524. 🇮🇹

IJSEM list: Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 61, part 10 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:5-6.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: correct name

• Notes:
  • 🧕 Salvetti et al. (2011) assigned this genus to the family Erysipelotrichaceae Verbarg et al. 2004. Publication: Salvetti E, Felis GE, Dellaglio F, Castioni A, Torriani S, Lawson PA. Reclassification of Lactobacillus catenaformis (Eggerth 1935) Moore and Holdeman 1970 and Lactobacillus vitulinus Sharpe et al. 1973 as Eggerthia catenaformis gen. nov., comb. nov. and Kandleria vitulina gen. nov., comb. nov., respectively. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:2520-2524. 🇮🇹
  • 🚋 The type species of this genus has alternatively been placed in the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901 (Approved Lists 1980). Publication: Sharpe ME, Latham MJ, Garvie EI, Zirngibl J, Kandler O. Two new species of Lactobacillus isolated from the bovine rumen, Lactobacillus ruminis sp.nov. and Lactobacillus vitulinus sp.nov. J Gen Microbiol 1973; 77:37-49.
  • 😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Using the term "phylogenetic data" (or equivalent) for sequence data is not advocated. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details. Publication: Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281. 🇬🇧
  • 🧬 The phylogenomic assignment score of this taxon is 0.12691 (N = 1).
  • 🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: DSM: 1; JCM: 1; NRRL: 1; CIP: 1; CCUG: 1; ATCC: 1; LMG: 1.

Subdivision:

Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 1
Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 1
Total number of child taxa: 1

• Child taxa:

  • Name	Nomenclatural status	Taxonomic status
    Kandleria vitulina (Sharpe et al. 1973) Salvetti et al. 2011	validly published under the ICNP	correct name

Parent taxon: Coprobacillaceae Verbarg et al. 2020

Assigned by: Verbarg S, Göker M, Scheuner C, Schumann P, Stackebrandt E. The families Erysipelotrichaceae emend., Coprobacillaceae fam. nov., and Turicibacteraceae fam. nov. In: Rosenberg E, DeLong E, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F (eds), The Prokaryotes –Firmicutes and Tenericutes., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2014, p. 79-105. 🇩🇪

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.518139Copy to clipboardLink copied to clipboard

Record number: 518139