Valid publication:
Xu FJ, Li QY, Li GD, Chen X, Jiang Y, Jiang CL. Kineococcus terrestris sp. nov. and Kineococcus aureolus sp. nov., isolated from saline sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:4801-4807. 🇨🇳
IJSEM list:
Oren A, Garrity GM. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 67, part 11 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:471-473.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP
Notes:
⏰ According to Huang et al. (2024), this species is an earlier heterotypic synonym of Kineococcusaureolus Xu et al. 2017.Publication:
Huang J, Li S, Liu J, Lu CY, Manzoor S, Dong L, Li WJ. Genome-based reclassification of Kineococcus aureolus Xu et al. 2017 as a later heterotypic synonym of Kineococcus terrestris Xu et al. 2017. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:6504. 🇨🇳
🏢 Synonymy of this taxon was mentioned in an IJSEM list.Publication:
Oren A, Göker M. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 74, part 8 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024; 74:6534.
😷 The risk group for Germany has been imported on 2026-08-13. The full classification is: risk group = 1. — If in doubt, use the risk group given in the regulations for your country and, if these are not available, use the risk group given in the catalogue of the culture collection from which you have obtained or intend to obtain the strain.
🎓 Name mentioned 2 times in PubMed until 2026-06-11.
🧍 In the abstract of the IJSEM original publication, the name is stated incorrectly as Kineococcus terreus (sic). — Leibniz Institute DSMZ. Prokaryotic Nomenclature Up-to-date, 2018-12-11.