Name: Sinomonas albida (Ding et al. 2009) Zhou et al. 2012

Category: Species

Proposed as: comb. nov.

Basonym: Arthrobacter albidus Ding et al. 2009

Etymology: al.bi’da. L. fem. adj. albida, whitish, referring to the colour of the colonies

Gender: feminine

Type strain: CCTCC 206018; CCTCC AB 206018; IAM 15386; JCM 21830; LC13

See detailed strain information at

Conduct genome-based taxonomy at

16S rRNA gene: AB248533 Analyse FASTA

Valid publication: Zhou Y, Chen X, Zhang Y, Wang W, Xu J. Description of Sinomonas soli sp. nov., reclassification of Arthrobacter echigonensis and Arthrobacter albidus (Ding et al. 2009) as Sinomonas echigonensis comb. nov. and Sinomonas albida comb. nov., respectively, and emended description of the genus Sinomonas. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:764-769.

IJSEM list: Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 62, part 4 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:1446-1447.

Nomenclatural status: validly published under the ICNP

Taxonomic status: correct name

• Synonyms:

  • Name	Kind
    Arthrobacter albidus Ding et al. 2009	homotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP

• Notes:
  • 😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details. Publication: Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281.
  • 🧬 The phylogenomic assignment score of this taxon is 0.08276 (N = 12).
  • 🎓 Name mentioned 4 times in PubMed until 2024-03-28.
  • 🧍 Not validly published according to Rule 30 (3b) as IAM 15386 = JCM 21830 was not available at the time of publication. Publication: Oren A, Arahal DR, Goker M, Moore ERB, Rossello-Mora R, Sutcliffe IC. International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Prokaryotic Code (2022 Revision). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:5585.
  • 🧍 So, according to Rule 30 (3b), the new combination Sinomonas albida is not validly published. Publication: Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 62, part 4 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:1446-1447.
  • 🧍 The IAM number (IAM 15386), cited in the publication by Zhou et al. 2012, is associated with a collection that had ceased to operate prior to publication of the paper. Publication: Zhou Y, Chen X, Zhang Y, Wang W, Xu J. Description of Sinomonas soli sp. nov., reclassification of Arthrobacter echigonensis and Arthrobacter albidus (Ding et al. 2009) as Sinomonas echigonensis comb. nov. and Sinomonas albida comb. nov., respectively, and emended description of the genus Sinomonas. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:764-769.
  • 🧍 The JCM has accessed many of the IAM strains. IAM 15386 was accessed as JCM 21830. However, according to Dr. T. Kudo (JCM), the strain JCM 21830 was not available at the time of publication. — Kudo T. Personal communication, 2012-04-12.

Parent taxon: Sinomonas Zhou et al. 2009

Assigned by: Zhou Y, Chen X, Zhang Y, Wang W, Xu J. Description of Sinomonas soli sp. nov., reclassification of Arthrobacter echigonensis and Arthrobacter albidus (Ding et al. 2009) as Sinomonas echigonensis comb. nov. and Sinomonas albida comb. nov., respectively, and emended description of the genus Sinomonas. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:764-769.

Linking: To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/species/sinomonas-albidaCopy to clipboardLink copied to clipboard

Record number: 789811