Etymology:Ther.mo.de.sul.fo.bi’i.a.N.L. neut. n.Thermodesulfobium, type genus of the class; L. neut. pl. n. suff.-ia, ending to denote a class; N.L. neut. pl. n.Thermodesulfobiia, the class of the genus Thermodesulfobium
Effective publication:
Frolov EN, Lebedinsky AV, Elcheninov AG, Kublanov IV. Taxonomic proposal for a deep branching bacterial phylogenetic lineage: transfer of the family Thermodesulfobiaceae to Thermodesulfobiales ord. nov., Thermodesulfobiia classis nov. and Thermodesulfobiota phyl. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 2023; 46:126388. 🇷🇺
IJSEM list:
Oren A, Göker M. Validation list no. 212. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:5931.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP
Notes:
🧕 Frolov et al. (2023) assigned this class to the phylum Thermodesulfobiota Frolov et al. 2023.Publication:
Frolov EN, Lebedinsky AV, Elcheninov AG, Kublanov IV. Taxonomic proposal for a deep branching bacterial phylogenetic lineage: transfer of the family Thermodesulfobiaceae to Thermodesulfobiales ord. nov., Thermodesulfobiia classis nov. and Thermodesulfobiota phyl. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 2023; 46:126388. 🇷🇺
🧒 Frolov et al. (2023) assigned the genus Thermodesulfobium Mori et al. 2004 to this class.Publication:
Frolov EN, Lebedinsky AV, Elcheninov AG, Kublanov IV. Taxonomic proposal for a deep branching bacterial phylogenetic lineage: transfer of the family Thermodesulfobiaceae to Thermodesulfobiales ord. nov., Thermodesulfobiia classis nov. and Thermodesulfobiota phyl. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 2023; 46:126388. 🇷🇺
🧒 Frolov et al. (2023) assigned the order Thermodesulfobiales Frolov et al. 2023 to this class.Publication:
Frolov EN, Lebedinsky AV, Elcheninov AG, Kublanov IV. Taxonomic proposal for a deep branching bacterial phylogenetic lineage: transfer of the family Thermodesulfobiaceae to Thermodesulfobiales ord. nov., Thermodesulfobiia classis nov. and Thermodesulfobiota phyl. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 2023; 46:126388. 🇷🇺
😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Names but not taxa can be validly published. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details.Publication:
Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281. 🇬🇧
❗ Thermodesulfobiia is the correct name instead if this class is regarded as a separate class (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another class whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority).
🧍 Nomenclatural type changed from Thermodesulfobiales Frolov et al. 2023 based on new Rule 22.Publication:
Oren A. Emendation of Rules 8, 15, 22, 25a, 30(3)(b), 30(4), 34a, and Appendix 7 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2023; 73:6070. 🇮🇱
Assigned by:
LPSN automated production system. The following publication is only one of the sources consulted.
It may or may not mention this taxon name. —
Oren A, Garrity GM. Valid publication of the names of forty-two phyla of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:5056. 🇮🇱
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.31705Link copied to clipboard
Record number:
31705
×
Support LPSN
Please sign and share this petition calling for caution before changing bacterial names in databases.