heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICN (Botanical Code)
Notes:
🧕 Komarek et al. (2014) assigned this family to the order "Synechococcales" Hoffmann et al. 2005.Publication:
Komárek J, Kaštovský J, Mareš J, Johansen JR. Taxonomic classification of cyanoprokaryotes (cyanobacterial genera) 2014, using a polyphasic approach. Preslia 2014; 86:295-335.
🧒 Komarek et al. (2014) assigned the genus Cyanocatenula Joosten 2006 to this family.Publication:
Komárek J, Kaštovský J, Mareš J, Johansen JR. Taxonomic classification of cyanoprokaryotes (cyanobacterial genera) 2014, using a polyphasic approach. Preslia 2014; 86:295-335.
🧒 Komarek et al. (2014) assigned the genus Wolskyella Claus 1963 to this family.Publication:
Komárek J, Kaštovský J, Mareš J, Johansen JR. Taxonomic classification of cyanoprokaryotes (cyanobacterial genera) 2014, using a polyphasic approach. Preslia 2014; 86:295-335.
🧒 Komarek et al. (2014) assigned the genus Tubiella Hollerbach 1935 to this family.Publication:
Komárek J, Kaštovský J, Mareš J, Johansen JR. Taxonomic classification of cyanoprokaryotes (cyanobacterial genera) 2014, using a polyphasic approach. Preslia 2014; 86:295-335.
🧒 Komarek et al. (2014) assigned the genus Romeria Koczwara 1932 to this family.Publication:
Komárek J, Kaštovský J, Mareš J, Johansen JR. Taxonomic classification of cyanoprokaryotes (cyanobacterial genera) 2014, using a polyphasic approach. Preslia 2014; 86:295-335.
🧒 Komarek et al. (2014) assigned the genus Campylotropium Hortobágyi and Hilliard 1965 to this family.Publication:
Komárek J, Kaštovský J, Mareš J, Johansen JR. Taxonomic classification of cyanoprokaryotes (cyanobacterial genera) 2014, using a polyphasic approach. Preslia 2014; 86:295-335.
🛺 The type genus of this family has been placed in the family Cymatolegaceae Strunecký and Mareš 2023.Publication:
Strunecky O, Ivanova AP, Mares J. An updated classification of cyanobacterial orders and families based on phylogenomic and polyphasic analysis. J Phycol 2023; 59:12-51.
🚃 The type genus of this family has alternatively been placed in the family Pseudanabaenaceae Anagnostidis and Komárek 1988.Publication:
Hoffmann L, Komárek J, Kaštovský J. System of cyanoprokaryotes (cyanobacteria) – state in 2004. Algol. Stud. 2005; 117:95-115.
🚃 The type genus of this family has alternatively been placed in the family Leptolyngbyaceae Komárek et al. 2014.Publication:
Mai T, Johansen JR, Pietrasiak N, Bohunická M, Martin MP. Revision of the Synechococcales (Cyanobacteria) through recognition of four families including Oculatellaceae fam. nov. and Trichocoleaceae fam. nov. and six new genera containing 14 species. Phytotaxa 2018; 365:1-59.
🚃 The type genus of this family has alternatively been placed in the family Oscillatoriaceae Engler 1898.Publication:
Elenkin AA. Sinezeleniye vodorosli SSSR. Monografiya presnovodnykh i nazemnykh S'yanofiseaye, obnaruzhennykh v predelakh SSSR. Spetsial'naya (sistematicheskaya) chast', vyp. II. III. Hormogoneae (Geitl.) Elenk. (okonchaniye). Izdate'stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, Moscow, 1949.
🚋 The type genus of this family has alternatively been placed in the family Cymatolegaceae Strunecký and Mareš 2023.Publication:
Strunecky O, Ivanova AP, Mares J. An updated classification of cyanobacterial orders and families based on phylogenomic and polyphasic analysis. J Phycol 2023; 59:12-51.
❗ Romeriaceae is the correct name instead if this family is regarded as a separate family (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another family whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority).
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://lpsn.dsmz.de/family/romeriaceaeLink copied to clipboard