Etymology:Am.phi.he.te.ro’cy.tum.Gr. prep.amphi, of two kinds; Gr. masc. adj.heteros, different; Gr. neut. n.kytos, cell; N.L. neut. n.Amphiheterocytum, with two different kinds of heterocytes
Valid publication:
Sant'Anna CL, Gama WA, Rigonato J, Correa G, Mesquita MCB, Marinho MM. Phylogenetic connection among close genera of Aphanizomenonaceae (Cyanobacteria): Amphiheterocytum gen. nov., Cylindrospermopsis and Sphaerospermopsis. Algal Research 2019; 37:205-214. 🇧🇷
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICN (Botanical Code)
Taxonomic status:
correct name
Notes:
🧕 Strunecky et al. (2023) assigned this genus to the family Aphanizomenonaceae Elenkin 1938.Publication:
Strunecky O, Ivanova AP, Mares J. An updated classification of cyanobacterial orders and families based on phylogenomic and polyphasic analysis. J Phycol 2023; 59:12-51. 🇨🇿
🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: SP: 1.
🧍 Full authorship: Sant'Anna et al. 2019.
Subdivision:
Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 1 Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 1 Total number of child taxa: 1
Assigned by:
Sant'Anna CL, Gama WA, Rigonato J, Correa G, Mesquita MCB, Marinho MM. Phylogenetic connection among close genera of Aphanizomenonaceae (Cyanobacteria): Amphiheterocytum gen. nov., Cylindrospermopsis and Sphaerospermopsis. Algal Research 2019; 37:205-214. 🇧🇷
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.6296Link copied to clipboard