Etymology:Cae.ci.bac.ter.o.i’des.N.L. gen. neut. n.caeci, of the caecum; from L. neut. n.caecum, cecum (can be noun or adjective); N.L. masc. n.bacter, rod; L. adj. suff.-oides, resembling, similar; N.L. masc. n.Caecibacteroides, rods isolated from the cecum
Original publication:
Kralova S, Davidova-Gerzova L, Valcek A, Bezdicek M, Rychlik I, Rezacova V, Cizek A. Paraphocaeicola brunensis gen. nov., sp. nov., Carrying Two Variants of nimB Resistance Gene from Bacteroides fragilis, and Caecibacteroides pullorum gen. nov., sp. nov., Two Novel Genera Isolated from Chicken Caeca. Microbiol Spectr 2022; 10:e0195421. 🇨🇿
Nomenclatural status:
not validly published
Taxonomic status:
preferred name (not correct name)
Notes:
🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: DSM: 1; CCM: 1.
Subdivision:
Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 0 Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 0 Total number of child taxa: 1
Assigned by:
Kralova S, Davidova-Gerzova L, Valcek A, Bezdicek M, Rychlik I, Rezacova V, Cizek A. Paraphocaeicola brunensis gen. nov., sp. nov., Carrying Two Variants of nimB Resistance Gene from Bacteroides fragilis, and Caecibacteroides pullorum gen. nov., sp. nov., Two Novel Genera Isolated from Chicken Caeca. Microbiol Spectr 2022; 10:e0195421. 🇨🇿
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.11718Link copied to clipboard