Etymology:Dong.hi’co.la.Korean n.Donghae, the Korean name of the East Sea in Korea; L. masc./fem. n. suff.-cola, a dweller, inhabitant; from L. masc./fem. n.incola, dweller; N.L. masc. n.Donghicola, a dweller of the East Sea in Korea
Valid publication:
Yoon JH, Kang SJ, Oh TK. Donghicola eburneus gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from seawater of the East Sea in Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:73-76. 🇰🇷
IJSEM list:
Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 57, part 1 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:659-660.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
Taxonomic status:
correct name
Emendations:
Hameed et al. 2014
Hameed A, Shahina M, Lin SY, Nakayan P, Liu YC, Lai WA, Hsu YH. Youngimonas vesicularis gen. nov., sp. nov., of the family Rhodobacteraceae, isolated from surface seawater, reclassification of Donghicola xiamenensis Tan et al. 2009 as Pseudodonghicola xiamenensis gen. nov., comb. nov. and emended description of the genus Donghicola Yoon et al. 2007. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:2729-2737. 🇹🇼
Oren A, Garrity GM. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 64, part 8 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:3607-3609. Notes:
⊖ Emendation accompanied by the removal of 1 species from the genus.
Notes:
🧕 Hameed et al. (2014) assigned this genus to the family Rhodobacteraceae Garrity et al. 2006.Publication:
Hameed A, Shahina M, Lin SY, Nakayan P, Liu YC, Lai WA, Hsu YH. Youngimonas vesicularis gen. nov., sp. nov., of the family Rhodobacteraceae, isolated from surface seawater, reclassification of Donghicola xiamenensis Tan et al. 2009 as Pseudodonghicola xiamenensis gen. nov., comb. nov. and emended description of the genus Donghicola Yoon et al. 2007. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:2729-2737. 🇹🇼
🙄 This taxon name is occasionally misprinted (or affected by an OCR error) in some sources as: "Doghicola"; "Dongicola".
😢 The terminology used by the authors is in line with many other taxonomic studies and does not negatively affect their main results; some improvements may nevertheless be possible. Contrasting the term "chemotaxonomic" with "phenotypic" is not recommended. Using the term "phylogenetic data" (or equivalent) for sequence data is not advocated. Whether taxa can have "members" is debatable. See the LPSN phylogeny page for details.Publication:
Göker M. What can genome analysis offer for bacteria? In: Bridge P, Smith D, Stackebrandt E (eds), Trends in the systematics of bacteria and fungi, CAB International, Wallingford, 2021, p. 255-281. 🇬🇧
🎰 The BRCs most frequently used for deposits in this group are: DSM: 3; KCTC: 3; JCM: 1; CGMCC: 1; MCCC: 1; TBRC: 1; LMG: 1; BCC: 1.
Subdivision:
Number of child taxa with a validly published and correct name: 3 Number of child taxa with a validly published name, including synonyms: 4 Total number of child taxa: 4
Assigned by:
Liang KYH, Orata FD, Boucher YF, Case RJ. Roseobacters in a Sea of Poly- and Paraphyly: Whole Genome-Based Taxonomy of the Family Rhodobacteraceae and the Proposal for the Split of the "Roseobacter Clade" Into a Novel Family, Roseobacteraceae fam. nov. Front Microbiol 2021; 12:683109. 🇨🇦
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.517501Link copied to clipboard