Etymology:sar.to’ri.i.N.L. gen. masc. n.sartorii, of Sartor, in honour of Balfour Sartor, Professor of Medicine, Microbiology and Immunology at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, for his outstanding contribution to the understanding of microbial ecology in IBD.
Effective publication:
Clavel T, Saalfrank A, Charrier C, Haller D. Isolation of bacteria from mouse caecal samples and description of Bacteroides sartorii sp. nov. Arch Microbiol 2010; 192:427-435. 🇩🇪
IJSEM list:
Euzeby JP. Validation list no. 134. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:1477-1479.
Nomenclatural status:
validly published under the ICNP
Taxonomic status:
synonym (and not recommended for medical use)
heterotypic synonym, validly published under the ICNP
Emendations:
Sakamoto and Ohkuma 2012
Sakamoto M, Ohkuma M. Bacteroides sartorii is an earlier heterotypic synonym of Bacteroides chinchillae and has priority. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:1241-1244. 🇯🇵
Euzeby JP. Notification list. Notification that new names and new combinations have appeared in volume 62, part 6 of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:2048-2049. Notes:
🫂 Emendation accompanied by a proposal regarding the synonymy of the species.
Notes:
⏰ According to Sakamoto and Ohkuma (2012), this species is an earlier heterotypic synonym of Phocaeicolachinchillae (Kitahara et al. 2011) García-López et al. 2020.Publication:
Sakamoto M, Ohkuma M. Bacteroides sartorii is an earlier heterotypic synonym of Bacteroides chinchillae and has priority. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:1241-1244. 🇯🇵
⏰ According to Sakamoto and Ohkuma (2012), this species is an earlier heterotypic synonym of Bacteroideschinchillae Kitahara et al. 2011.Publication:
Sakamoto M, Ohkuma M. Bacteroides sartorii is an earlier heterotypic synonym of Bacteroides chinchillae and has priority. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:1241-1244. 🇯🇵
❗ Bacteroidessartorii is the correct name instead if this species is regarded as a separate species (i.e., if its nomenclatural type is not assigned to another species whose name is validly published, legitimate and not rejected and has priority) within a separate genus Bacteroides.
😷 The risk group for Germany has been imported on 2026-08-13. The full classification is: risk group = 1. — If in doubt, use the risk group given in the regulations for your country and, if these are not available, use the risk group given in the catalogue of the culture collection from which you have obtained or intend to obtain the strain.
🎓 Name mentioned 19 times in PubMed until 2026-06-11.
🙅 This name is on the List of Recommended Names for bacteria of medical importance (LoRN) as a synonym of the name to be applied to this species. The name is on LoRN because of the recorded risk group of the genus.
🧍 The phylogenetic position of this species was determined in a genome-scale analysis by García-López et al. (2019).Publication:
Garcia-Lopez M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Tindall BJ, Gronow S, Woyke T, Kyrpides NC, Hahnke RL, Goker M. Analysis of 1,000 Type-Strain Genomes Improves Taxonomic Classification of Bacteroidetes. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:2083. 🇩🇪
Assigned by:
Clavel T, Saalfrank A, Charrier C, Haller D. Isolation of bacteria from mouse caecal samples and description of Bacteroides sartorii sp. nov. Arch Microbiol 2010; 192:427-435. 🇩🇪
Linking:
To permanently link to this page, use https://doi.org/10.83108/rn.788557Link copied to clipboard
Record number:
788557
×
Support LPSN
Please sign and share this petition calling for caution before changing bacterial names in databases.